Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] blktrace: last round of fixes

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 28 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > This is the last round of fixes for blktrace, I hope.  :) 
> > > 
> > > Changelog v1 -> v2:
> > >   - fix a bug in "blktrace: make classic output more classic",
> > >     and rebase other patches.
> > >   - re-order patches.
> > >   - a new patch for filtering BLK_TN_MESSAGE
> > > 
> > > [PATCH v2 1/6] trace: make 'mem' argument of trace_seq_putmem() const
> > > [PATCH v2 2/6] blktrace: make classic output more classic
> > > [PATCH v2 3/6] blktrace: fix blk_probes_ref chaos
> > > [PATCH v2 4/6] blktrace: fix memory leak when freeing struct blk_io_trace
> > > [PATCH v2 5/6] blktrace: extract duplidate code
> > > [PATCH v2 6/6] blktrace: print out BLK_TN_MESSAGE properly
> > > ---
> > >  blktrace.c     |  188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> > >  trace_output.c |    6 -
> > >  trace_output.h |    5 -
> > >  3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Li, Jens - what's your call for v2.6.30, can the blktrace changes go 
> > upstream or should i zap the whole thing?
> > 
> > There are no new -tip test failures here so it's green as far as i'm 
> > concerned. It's holding up the tracing tree so we need to decide one 
> > way or another.
> 
> If Li deems it ready, then it has my blessing as well.

thanks Jens - i have added your Acked-by's as well.

	Ingo