Re: Q: check_unsafe_exec() races (Was: [PATCH 2/4] fix setuid sometimes doesn't)

Hugh Dickins
2009-04-01T11:27:09Z

On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Al Viro wrote:
>
> Rebased and pushed (same tree, same branch; included into for-next, along
> with related cleanups).

for-next? But don't we need all this (or at least the first four of
your five, on top of the four Linus took from me) in -stable now?

I was wondering if we should ask Chris to do a 2.6.29.1-rc2 with
them; but perhaps you'd much rather expose them in -next for a
while, before sending Linus and 2.6.29.2.

Hugh