public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	"Balbir Singh" <balbir@in.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Nominate idle load balancer from a semi-idle package.
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:08:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090402123829.14569.67639.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090402123607.14569.33649.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com>

Currently the nomination of idle-load balancer is done by choosing the first
idle cpu in the nohz.cpu_mask. This may not be power-efficient, since
such an idle cpu could come from a completely idle core/package thereby
preventing the whole core/package from being in a low-power state.

For eg, consider a quad-core dual package system. The cpu numbering need
not be sequential and can something like [0, 2, 4, 6] and [1, 3, 5, 7].
With sched_mc/smt_power_savings and the power-aware IRQ balance, we try to keep
as fewer Packages/Cores active. But the current idle load balancer logic
goes against this by choosing the first_cpu in the nohz.cpu_mask and not
taking the system topology into consideration.

Improve the algorithm to nominate the idle load balancer from a semi idle
cores/packages thereby increasing the probability of the cores/packages being
in deeper sleep states for longer duration.

The algorithm is activated only when sched_mc/smt_power_savings != 0.

Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
---

 kernel/sched.c |  109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 706517c..4fc1ec0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -4283,10 +4283,108 @@ static void active_load_balance(struct rq *busiest_rq, int busiest_cpu)
 static struct {
 	atomic_t load_balancer;
 	cpumask_var_t cpu_mask;
+	cpumask_var_t tmpmask;
 } nohz ____cacheline_aligned = {
 	.load_balancer = ATOMIC_INIT(-1),
 };
 
+#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC) || defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
+/**
+ * lowest_flag_domain: Returns the lowest sched_domain
+ * that has the given flag set for a particular cpu.
+ * @cpu: The cpu whose lowest level of sched domain is to
+ * be returned.
+ *
+ * @flag: The flag to check for the lowest sched_domain
+ * for the given cpu
+ */
+static inline struct sched_domain *lowest_flag_domain(int cpu, int flag)
+{
+	struct sched_domain *sd;
+
+	for_each_domain(cpu, sd)
+		if (sd && (sd->flags & flag))
+			break;
+
+	return sd;
+}
+
+/**
+ * for_each_flag_domain: Iterates over all the scheduler domains
+ * for a given cpu that has the 'flag' set, starting from
+ * the lowest to the highest.
+ * @cpu: The cpu whose domains we're iterating over.
+ * @sd: variable holding the value of the power_savings_sd
+ * for cpu
+ */
+#define for_each_flag_domain(cpu, sd, flag) \
+	for (sd = lowest_flag_domain(cpu, flag); \
+		(sd && (sd->flags & flag)); sd = sd->parent)
+
+static inline int is_semi_idle_group(struct sched_group *ilb_group)
+{
+	cpumask_and(nohz.tmpmask, nohz.cpu_mask, sched_group_cpus(ilb_group));
+
+	/*
+	 * A sched_group is semi-idle when it has atleast one busy cpu
+	 * and atleast one idle cpu.
+	 */
+	if (!(cpumask_empty(nohz.tmpmask) ||
+		cpumask_equal(nohz.tmpmask, sched_group_cpus(ilb_group))))
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+/**
+ * find_new_ilb: Finds or nominates a new idle load balancer.
+ * @cpu: The cpu which is nominating a new idle_load_balancer.
+ *
+ * This algorithm picks the idle load balancer such that it belongs to a
+ * semi-idle powersavings sched_domain. The idea is to try and avoid
+ * completely idle packages/cores just for the purpose of idle load balancing
+ * when there are other idle cpu's which are better suited for that job.
+ */
+static int find_new_ilb(int cpu)
+{
+	struct sched_domain *sd;
+	struct sched_group *ilb_group;
+
+	/*
+	 * Optimization for the case when there is no idle cpu or
+	 * only 1 idle cpu to choose from.
+	 */
+	if (cpumask_weight(nohz.cpu_mask) < 2)
+		goto out_done;
+
+	/*
+	 * Have idle load balancer selection from semi-idle packages only
+	 * when power-aware load balancing is enabled
+	 */
+	if (!(sched_smt_power_savings || sched_mc_power_savings))
+		goto out_done;
+
+	for_each_flag_domain(cpu, sd, SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE) {
+		ilb_group = sd->groups;
+
+		do {
+			if (is_semi_idle_group(ilb_group))
+				return cpumask_first(nohz.tmpmask);
+
+			ilb_group = ilb_group->next;
+
+		} while (ilb_group != sd->groups);
+	}
+
+out_done:
+	return cpumask_first(nohz.cpu_mask);
+}
+#else /*  (CONFIG_SCHED_MC || CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) */
+static inline int find_new_ilb(int call_cpu)
+{
+	return first_cpu(nohz.cpu_mask);
+}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * This routine will try to nominate the ilb (idle load balancing)
  * owner among the cpus whose ticks are stopped. ilb owner will do the idle
@@ -4511,15 +4609,7 @@ static inline void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
 		}
 
 		if (atomic_read(&nohz.load_balancer) == -1) {
-			/*
-			 * simple selection for now: Nominate the
-			 * first cpu in the nohz list to be the next
-			 * ilb owner.
-			 *
-			 * TBD: Traverse the sched domains and nominate
-			 * the nearest cpu in the nohz.cpu_mask.
-			 */
-			int ilb = cpumask_first(nohz.cpu_mask);
+			int ilb = find_new_ilb(cpu);
 
 			if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids)
 				resched_cpu(ilb);
@@ -9046,6 +9136,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
 	alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&nohz.cpu_mask);
+	alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&nohz.tmpmask);
 #endif
 	alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&cpu_isolated_map);
 #endif /* SMP */


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-02 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-02 12:38 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched: Nominate a power-efficient ILB Gautham R Shenoy
2009-04-02 12:38 ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2009-04-02 15:52   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Nominate idle load balancer from a semi-idle package Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-03 14:59     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-04-03 15:14       ` Randy Dunlap
2009-04-03  7:04   ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-03 15:11     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-04-02 12:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched: Nominate a power-efficient ilb in select_nohz_balancer() Gautham R Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090402123829.14569.67639.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com \
    --to=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox