From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Commit 7a192ec is build breaking
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 21:17:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090404041740.GA6504@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090328140049.GA4344@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 02:00:49PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> The commit:
>
> platform driver: fix incorrect use of 'platform_bus_type' with 'struct device_driver'
>
> contains this:
>
> -static int __exit pxa2xx_flash_remove(struct device *dev)
> +static int __exit pxa2xx_flash_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> ...
> - .remove = __exit_p(pxa2xx_flash_remove),
> + .remove = __devexit_p(pxa2xx_flash_remove),
>
> which leads to the following build error:
>
> `pxa2xx_flash_remove' referenced in section `.data' of drivers/built-in.o: defined in discarded section `.exit.text' of drivers/built-in.o
>
> This is not the only instance of it in this patch - all __exit_p's
> touched by this patch have been converted to __devexit_p's without
> regard to the original function.
>
> Let's revert this change and, if we are going to convert functions
> to be __devexit/__devinit, lets have that as a _separate_ patch doing
> just that change.
Ick, Ming, any thoughts? I'll revert your patch as it looks like it is
incorrect in this way.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-04 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-28 14:00 Commit 7a192ec is build breaking Russell King
2009-04-02 14:57 ` Russell King
2009-04-04 4:17 ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-04-04 7:18 ` Ming Lei
2009-04-04 9:44 ` Russell King
2009-04-04 16:08 ` Greg KH
2009-04-04 16:13 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090404041740.GA6504@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox