From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, manfred@colorfullife.com,
peterz@infradead.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, kernel@wantstofly.org,
kyle@mcmartin.ca, deller@gmx.de, davem@davemloft.net,
ralf@linux-mips.org, jes@sgi.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] Convert CONFIG_SMP=y powerpc defconfigs to TREE_RCU.
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:49:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090405164904.GJ6893@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090405103759.GA17934@one.firstfloor.org>
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 12:37:59PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I'd suggest you dont do these dozens of defconfig updates at all -
> > arch maintainers can do this themselves, once the core kernel
> > default has been flipped.
>
> AFAIK they don't. There's no make updatemyconfigwithdefaultstatementsconfig
My guess is that I would in fact have to send a few patches. But I
suppose that the real question is "how long should we wait to drop
Classic RCU once the last arch has changed its defconfig?" I have
been assuming that we would wait one release cycle.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-05 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3181463559098978317@unknownmsgid>
2009-04-04 13:21 ` [PATCH -tip] Convert CONFIG_SMP=y powerpc defconfigs to TREE_RCU Josh Boyer
2009-04-04 16:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-05 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-05 10:37 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-05 16:49 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2009-04-05 17:01 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-05 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-05 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-08 12:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-08 17:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-08 18:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-08 18:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-04 0:27 [PATCH -tip] Make TREE_RCU be default (was CLASSIC_RCU) Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-04 0:27 ` [PATCH -tip] Convert CONFIG_SMP=y powerpc defconfigs to TREE_RCU Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090405164904.GJ6893@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@wantstofly.org \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox