From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761573AbZDGP0l (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:26:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757321AbZDGPNV (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:13:21 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:39471 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760000AbZDGPNT (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:13:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:12:24 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: David Woodhouse , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: fix build with CONFIG_BRANCH_TRACER=y Message-ID: <20090407151224.GA14486@elte.hu> References: <1239083045.22733.383.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20090407054818.GA5557@elte.hu> <20090407055245.GA10406@elte.hu> <1239084280.22733.404.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20090407061558.GA31261@elte.hu> <20090407084950.GA1467@elte.hu> <20090407090229.GA2467@elte.hu> <1239104035.22733.443.camel@macbook.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Can we please do it something like the following instead: > > > > #define if(a, ...) \ > > __trace_if( (a, ## __VA_ARGS__) ) > > > > so that you don't need to do that ", ## __VA_ARGS__" thing three times? > > IOW, does this (TOTALLY UNTESTED) patch work? i've done some (very light) testing and it works here. Ingo