From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
ReiserFS Development List <reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: kill-the-BKL
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 23:57:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090407215721.GA6252@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4423d670904071434w6a687568hc6f2a380a8b32661@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:34:07AM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> Hi Frederic
>
> I've applied your patch.
> This is UP system.
> This warning seems related to your patch.
>
>
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.29-10247-g8e2c4f2-dirty #2
> -------------------------------------------------------
> udevadm/1239 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<c0173f52>] might_fault+0x52/0xa0
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (sysfs_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c01ccd36>] sysfs_readdir+0x56/0x200
Ah, I've never hit it. I'm not sure this is related to my patch
but it could be.
Could you send me your config?
Thanks,
Frederic.
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #3 (sysfs_mutex){+.+.+.}:
> [<c014fb2a>] __lock_acquire+0xd1a/0x1160
> [<c014ffe4>] lock_acquire+0x74/0x90
> [<c0448d70>] __mutex_lock_common+0x50/0x430
> [<c0449203>] mutex_lock_nested+0x33/0x40
> [<c01cd17c>] sysfs_addrm_start+0x2c/0xc0
> [<c01cdd30>] create_dir+0x40/0x80
> [<c01cdd9b>] sysfs_create_dir+0x2b/0x50
> [<c02c3121>] kobject_add_internal+0xc1/0x220
> [<c02c3351>] kobject_add_varg+0x31/0x50
> [<c02c33cc>] kobject_add+0x2c/0x60
> [<c0337a52>] device_add+0xe2/0x540
> [<c01cac02>] add_partition+0x112/0x210
> [<c01cb2ef>] rescan_partitions+0x23f/0x320
> [<c01b0f13>] __blkdev_get+0x153/0x330
> [<c01b10fa>] blkdev_get+0xa/0x10
> [<c01caaca>] register_disk+0x10a/0x130
> [<c02bd5c9>] add_disk+0x109/0x170
> [<c034e85a>] sd_probe_async+0x19a/0x280
> [<c0143900>] async_thread+0xd0/0x230
> [<c013d86a>] kthread+0x3a/0x70
> [<c0103677>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> -> #2 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}:
> [<c014fb2a>] __lock_acquire+0xd1a/0x1160
> [<c014ffe4>] lock_acquire+0x74/0x90
> [<c0448d70>] __mutex_lock_common+0x50/0x430
> [<c0449203>] mutex_lock_nested+0x33/0x40
> [<c01b0df3>] __blkdev_get+0x33/0x330
> [<c01b10fa>] blkdev_get+0xa/0x10
> [<c01b1261>] open_by_devnum+0x21/0x50
> [<c01fed2e>] journal_init+0x22e/0x19a0
> [<c01ea881>] reiserfs_fill_super+0x3a1/0x1050
> [<c018d053>] get_sb_bdev+0x133/0x160
> [<c01e8b21>] get_super_block+0x21/0x30
> [<c018bd7a>] vfs_kern_mount+0x3a/0xa0
> [<c018be39>] do_kern_mount+0x39/0xd0
> [<c01a2063>] do_mount+0x3a3/0x790
> [<c01a24d9>] sys_mount+0x89/0xc0
> [<c06fac3d>] mount_block_root+0xd0/0x261
> [<c06fae27>] mount_root+0x59/0x5f
> [<c06faf1c>] prepare_namespace+0xef/0x171
> [<c06fa4e3>] kernel_init+0xd5/0xee
> [<c0103677>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> -> #1 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}:
> [<c014fb2a>] __lock_acquire+0xd1a/0x1160
> [<c014ffe4>] lock_acquire+0x74/0x90
> [<c0448d70>] __mutex_lock_common+0x50/0x430
> [<c0449203>] mutex_lock_nested+0x33/0x40
> [<c020375e>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x1e/0x30
> [<c01df2e6>] reiserfs_get_block+0x66/0x14f0
> [<c01b32f0>] do_mpage_readpage+0x340/0x490
> [<c01b352e>] mpage_readpages+0x9e/0xe0
> [<c01dc729>] reiserfs_readpages+0x19/0x20
> [<c01696ff>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x13f/0x200
> [<c016980e>] do_page_cache_readahead+0x4e/0x70
> [<c0162caf>] filemap_fault+0x30f/0x430
> [<c0175f6d>] __do_fault+0x3d/0x360
> [<c0176aa0>] handle_mm_fault+0x100/0x590
> [<c011aff1>] do_page_fault+0x121/0x280
> [<c044b40a>] error_code+0x6a/0x70
> [<c01bf810>] load_elf_binary+0x9d0/0x19f0
> [<c018fde3>] search_binary_handler+0x163/0x2f0
> [<c019018d>] do_execve+0x21d/0x2b0
> [<c01016de>] sys_execve+0x3e/0x70
> [<c0102ec9>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
> [<c014fbde>] __lock_acquire+0xdce/0x1160
> [<c014ffe4>] lock_acquire+0x74/0x90
> [<c0173f83>] might_fault+0x83/0xa0
> [<c02ca436>] copy_to_user+0x36/0x130
> [<c0197b24>] filldir64+0xa4/0xf0
> [<c01ccdf6>] sysfs_readdir+0x116/0x200
> [<c0197d9e>] vfs_readdir+0x7e/0xa0
> [<c0197e29>] sys_getdents64+0x69/0xb0
> [<c0102e48>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> 2 locks held by udevadm/1239:
> #0: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0197d6f>] vfs_readdir+0x4f/0xa0
> #1: (sysfs_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c01ccd36>] sysfs_readdir+0x56/0x200
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 1239, comm: udevadm Not tainted 2.6.29-10247-g8e2c4f2-dirty #2
> Call Trace:
> [<c0447c92>] ? printk+0x18/0x1e
> [<c014db5c>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x8c/0xe0
> [<c014fbde>] __lock_acquire+0xdce/0x1160
> [<c014bb1d>] ? put_lock_stats+0xd/0x30
> [<c014ffe4>] lock_acquire+0x74/0x90
> [<c0173f52>] ? might_fault+0x52/0xa0
> [<c0173f83>] might_fault+0x83/0xa0
> [<c0173f52>] ? might_fault+0x52/0xa0
> [<c02ca436>] copy_to_user+0x36/0x130
> [<c0197b24>] filldir64+0xa4/0xf0
> [<c01ccdf6>] sysfs_readdir+0x116/0x200
> [<c0197a80>] ? filldir64+0x0/0xf0
> [<c0197d9e>] vfs_readdir+0x7e/0xa0
> [<c0197a80>] ? filldir64+0x0/0xf0
> [<c0197e29>] sys_getdents64+0x69/0xb0
> [<c0102e48>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-07 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-07 2:19 [PATCH] reiserfs: kill-the-BKL Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-07 11:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-07 13:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-07 21:34 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-04-07 21:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-04-07 22:19 ` Alexander Beregalov
2009-04-08 0:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-09 15:15 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-09 15:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-09 18:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-09 19:36 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-09 20:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-09 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-10 0:39 ` Bron Gondwana
2009-04-10 13:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-09 21:07 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090407215721.GA6252@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=a.beregalov@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brong@fastmail.fm \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox