From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Brian Maly <bmaly@redhat.com>,
h.peter.anvin@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dannf@hp.com, ying.huang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: add x86 support for rtc-efi
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:51:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090410135102.GB24809@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090409161803.f79c0b64.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:55:49 -0400
> Brian Maly <bmaly@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > re-post of the patch, both as inline and as an attachment (which
> > hopefully wont cause confusion).
> >
>
> Normally it does confuse me horridly because I get two copies of the
> same patch, which applies happily with `patch --dry-run', but dies
> horridly with `patch --for-real'. But I was warned...
>
> In future, please include a full copy of the (possibly modified)
> changelog with each iteration of a patch.
>
> As this patch is mostly-x86 I tossed it onto my for-Ingo pile.
>
>
> From: Brian Maly <bmaly@redhat.com>
>
> Add support for rtc-efi (RTC Class Driver for EFI-based systems) to x86.
>
> This patch has been tested and works perfectly on every x86 EFI system I
> could find, though all have been EL64 systems. I would appreciate any
> testing feedback from EL32 systems from anyone that has one and can test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Maly <bmaly@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: dann frazier <dannf@hp.com>
> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
> Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Hm, it would be nice to first unify the relevant bits of
arch/x86/kernel/time_{32|64}.c into arch/x86/kernel/time.c, and then
we can apply such patches without duplicative effects.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-10 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-06 17:49 [PATCH] rtc: add x86 support for rtc-efi Brian Maly
2009-04-06 19:31 ` dann frazier
2009-04-06 22:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-06 22:55 ` Brian Maly
2009-04-08 16:23 ` dann frazier
2009-04-09 23:18 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-10 13:51 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-04-20 17:15 ` Brian Maly
2009-04-20 17:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-20 18:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-19 20:10 ` Brian Maly
2009-05-25 5:49 ` Huang Ying
2009-05-25 16:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-27 23:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-10 1:08 ` Huang Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090410135102.GB24809@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bmaly@redhat.com \
--cc=dannf@hp.com \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).