From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"npiggin@suse.de" <npiggin@suse.de>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"yinghan@google.com" <yinghan@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] readahead: enforce full sync mmap readahead size
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:09:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090412070943.GB5737@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090410163413.a014bde0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Now that we do readahead for sequential mmap reads, here is
a simple evaluation of the impacts, and one further optimization.
It's an NFS-root debian desktop system, readahead size = 60 pages.
The numbers are grabbed after a fresh boot into console.
approach pgmajfault RA miss ratio mmap IO count avg IO size(pages)
A 383 31.6% 383 11
B 225 32.4% 390 11
C 224 32.6% 307 13
case A: mmap sync/async readahead disabled
case B: mmap sync/async readahead enabled, with enforced full async readahead size
case C: mmap sync/async readahead enabled, with enforced full sync/async readahead size
or:
A = vanilla 2.6.30-rc1
B = A plus mmap readahead
C = B plus this patch
The numbers show that
- there are good possibilities for random mmap reads to trigger readahead
- 'pgmajfault' is reduced by 1/3, due to the _async_ nature of readahead
- case C can further reduce IO count by 1/4
- readahead miss ratios are not quite affected
The theory is
- readahead is _good_ for clustered random reads, and can perform
_better_ than readaround because they could be _async_.
- async readahead size is guaranteed to be larger than readaround
size, and they are _async_, hence will mostly behave better
However for B
- sync readahead size could be smaller than readaround size, hence may
make things worse by produce more smaller IOs
which will be fixed by this patch.
Final conclusion:
- mmap readahead reduced major faults by 1/3 and no obvious overheads;
- mmap io can be further reduced by 1/4 with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
mm/filemap.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- mm.orig/mm/filemap.c
+++ mm/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1471,7 +1471,8 @@ static void do_sync_mmap_readahead(struc
if (VM_SequentialReadHint(vma) ||
offset - 1 == (ra->prev_pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT)) {
ra->flags |= RA_FLAG_MMAP;
- page_cache_sync_readahead(mapping, ra, file, offset, 1);
+ page_cache_sync_readahead(mapping, ra, file, offset,
+ ra->ra_pages);
return;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-12 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-10 6:09 [PATCH 0/9] filemap and readahead fixes for linux-next Wu Fengguang
2009-04-10 6:09 ` [PATCH 1/9] readahead: move max_sane_readahead() calls into force_page_cache_readahead() Wu Fengguang
2009-04-10 6:09 ` [PATCH 2/9] readahead: apply max_sane_readahead() limit in ondemand_readahead() Wu Fengguang
2009-04-10 6:10 ` [PATCH 3/9] readahead: remove one unnecessary radix tree lookup Wu Fengguang
2009-04-10 6:10 ` [PATCH 4/9] readahead: increase interleaved readahead size Wu Fengguang
2009-04-10 6:10 ` [PATCH 5/9] readahead: remove sync/async readahead call dependency Wu Fengguang
2009-04-10 6:10 ` [PATCH 6/9] readahead: clean up and simplify the code for filemap page fault readahead Wu Fengguang
2009-04-10 23:48 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-11 13:58 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-11 18:49 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-12 23:16 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-10 6:10 ` [PATCH 7/9] readahead: sequential mmap readahead Wu Fengguang
2009-04-10 23:34 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-12 6:50 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-04-12 7:09 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-04-12 15:15 ` [PATCH] readahead: enforce full sync mmap readahead size Linus Torvalds
2009-04-13 13:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-04-14 7:01 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-10 6:10 ` [PATCH 8/9] readahead: enforce full readahead size on async mmap readahead Wu Fengguang
2009-04-10 6:10 ` [PATCH 9/9] readahead: record mmap read-around states in file_ra_state Wu Fengguang
2009-04-10 23:38 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-11 4:24 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090412070943.GB5737@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox