From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>,
Andrew Morgan <morgan@kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Igor Zhbanov <izh1979@gmail.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>,
stable@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: [PATCH] add some long-missing capabilities to fs_mask
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:56:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090413145614.GA15342@us.ibm.com> (raw)
When POSIX capabilities were introduced during the 2.1 Linux
cycle, the fs mask, which represents the capabilities which having
fsuid==0 is supposed to grant, did not include CAP_MKNOD and
CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE. However, before capabilities the privilege
to call these did in fact depend upon fsuid==0.
This patch introduces those capabilities into the fsmask,
restoring the old behavior.
See the thread starting at http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/11/157 for
reference.
Note that if this fix is deemed valid, then earlier kernel versions (2.4
and 2.2) ought to be fixed too.
Changelog:
[Mar 23] Actually delete old CAP_FS_SET definition...
[Mar 20] Updated against J. Bruce Fields's patch
Reported-by: Igor Zhbanov <izh1979@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
---
include/linux/capability.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
index 4864a43..c302110 100644
--- a/include/linux/capability.h
+++ b/include/linux/capability.h
@@ -377,7 +377,21 @@ struct cpu_vfs_cap_data {
#define CAP_FOR_EACH_U32(__capi) \
for (__capi = 0; __capi < _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S; ++__capi)
+/*
+ * CAP_FS_MASK and CAP_NFSD_MASKS:
+ *
+ * The fs mask is all the privileges that fsuid==0 historically meant.
+ * At one time in the past, that included CAP_MKNOD and CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE.
+ *
+ * It has never meant setting security.* and trusted.* xattrs.
+ *
+ * We could also define fsmask as follows:
+ * 1. CAP_FS_MASK is the privilege to bypass all fs-related DAC permissions
+ * 2. The security.* and trusted.* xattrs are fs-related MAC permissions
+ */
+
# define CAP_FS_MASK_B0 (CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_CHOWN) \
+ | CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_MKNOD) \
| CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE) \
| CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH) \
| CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_FOWNER) \
@@ -392,11 +406,12 @@ struct cpu_vfs_cap_data {
# define CAP_EMPTY_SET ((kernel_cap_t){{ 0, 0 }})
# define CAP_FULL_SET ((kernel_cap_t){{ ~0, ~0 }})
# define CAP_INIT_EFF_SET ((kernel_cap_t){{ ~CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SETPCAP), ~0 }})
-# define CAP_FS_SET ((kernel_cap_t){{ CAP_FS_MASK_B0, CAP_FS_MASK_B1 } })
+# define CAP_FS_SET ((kernel_cap_t){{ CAP_FS_MASK_B0 \
+ | CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE), \
+ CAP_FS_MASK_B1 } })
# define CAP_NFSD_SET ((kernel_cap_t){{ CAP_FS_MASK_B0 \
- | CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) \
- | CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_MKNOD), \
- CAP_FS_MASK_B1 } })
+ | CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE), \
+ CAP_FS_MASK_B1 } })
#endif /* _KERNEL_CAPABILITY_U32S != 2 */
--
1.5.4.3
----- End forwarded message -----
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-13 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-13 14:56 Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2009-04-13 21:03 ` [PATCH] add some long-missing capabilities to fs_mask Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-04-13 21:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-13 21:50 ` Serge E. Hallyn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-23 22:46 Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-20 18:37 Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090413145614.GA15342@us.ibm.com \
--to=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=izh1979@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox