public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>, "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"lcm@us.ibm.com" <lcm@us.ibm.com>,
	suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] irq, x86: Remove IRQ_DISABLED check in process context IRQ move
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:20:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090413222058.GB8211@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1ab6kfkwj.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>


As discussed in the thread here
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123964468521142&w=2

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like some additional bugs have slipped in since last I looked.
>
> set_irq_affinity does this:
> ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
>        if (desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT || desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED) {
>                cpumask_copy(desc->affinity, cpumask);
>                desc->chip->set_affinity(irq, cpumask);
>        } else {
>                desc->status |= IRQ_MOVE_PENDING;
>                cpumask_copy(desc->pending_mask, cpumask);
>        }
> #else
>
> That IRQ_DISABLED case is a software state and as such it has nothing to
> do with how safe it is to move an irq in process context.
>

"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> writes:
> On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 04:01 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >
> > If the goal is moving MSIs, we should modify the msi code to be safe
> > in process context and to set IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT.
> >
> > The only reason we migrate MSIs in interrupt context today is that there
> > wasn't infrastructure for support migration both in interrupt context
> > and outside of it.
>
> Yes. The idea here was to force the MSI migration to happen in process
> context. One of the patches in the series did
>
>         disable_irq(dev->irq);
>         irq_set_affinity(dev->irq, cpumask_of(dev->cpu));
>         enable_irq(dev->irq);
>
> with the above patch adding irq/manage code check for interrupt disabled
> and moving the interrupt in process context.
>
> IIRC, there was no IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT when we were developing this HPET
> code and we ended up having this ugly hack. IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT was there
> when we eventually submitted the patch upstream. But, looks like I did a
> blind rebasing instead of using IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT in hpet MSI code. That
> was my fault. Will send a patch to fix this ugliness.

Below patch fixes this. i.e., revert
commit 932775a4ab622e3c99bd59f14cc7d96722f79501
and add PCNTXT to HPET MSI setup. Also removes copying of desc->affinity
in generic code as set_affinity routines are doing it internally.

Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c |    2 ++
 kernel/irq/manage.c            |    5 ++---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index 767fe7e..aaf8212 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -3667,12 +3667,14 @@ int arch_setup_hpet_msi(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	int ret;
 	struct msi_msg msg;
+	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
 
 	ret = msi_compose_msg(NULL, irq, &msg);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
 	hpet_msi_write(irq, &msg);
+	desc->status |= IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT;
 	set_irq_chip_and_handler_name(irq, &hpet_msi_type, handle_edge_irq,
 		"edge");
 
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 7e2e7dd..2734eca 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -109,10 +109,9 @@ int irq_set_affinity(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *cpumask)
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
-	if (desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT || desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED) {
-		cpumask_copy(desc->affinity, cpumask);
+	if (desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT)
 		desc->chip->set_affinity(irq, cpumask);
-	} else {
+	else {
 		desc->status |= IRQ_MOVE_PENDING;
 		cpumask_copy(desc->pending_mask, cpumask);
 	}
-- 
1.6.0.6


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-13 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-08 21:07 [PATCH 2/3] [BUGFIX] x86/x86_64: fix CPU offlining triggered inactive device IRQ interrruption Gary Hade
2009-04-08 22:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-08 23:37   ` Gary Hade
2009-04-08 23:58     ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-08 23:59       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-09 19:17         ` Gary Hade
2009-04-09 22:38           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-10  0:53             ` Gary Hade
2009-04-10  1:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-10 20:09   ` Gary Hade
2009-04-10 22:02     ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-11  7:44       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-11  7:51       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-04-11 11:01         ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-13 17:41           ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-04-13 18:50             ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-13 22:20               ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh [this message]
2009-04-14  1:40                 ` [PATCH] irq, x86: Remove IRQ_DISABLED check in process context IRQ move Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-14 14:06                 ` [tip:irq/urgent] x86, irq: " tip-bot for Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-04-12 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] [BUGFIX] x86/x86_64: fix CPU offlining triggered inactive device IRQ interrruption Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-13 21:09   ` Gary Hade

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090413222058.GB8211@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox