From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/lockdep: turn lock->name into an array
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:53:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090414065303.GA24626@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090414153035.C662.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> > Impact: allow filtering by lock name / fix module tracing
> >
> > Currently, the "lock acquired" event is traced using a TRACE_EVENT.
> > But we can't use the char * type for the name without risking to
> > dereference a freed pointer. A lock name can come from a module
> > towards lockdep and it is risky to only store its address because we
> > defer its name printing.
>
> When released lockdep string table? I guess it only happend at
> module unloading. if so, we should consider to make delayed string
> table freeing at module unloading.
>
> My point is, module unloading is rare event. thus meking pointer
> safe mechanism widely avoid string copy.
>
> IOW, if not, ringbuffer is filled tons string. it kill the merit
> of binary buffer and current design.
We could zap all pending trace entries on module unload (it is a
rare operation). That would indeed make a whole category of
symbol-alike string pointers safe to be passed by value.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-14 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-13 22:36 [PATCH] tracing/lockdep: turn lock->name into an array Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-13 22:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-13 22:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-14 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 21:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-13 23:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 0:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-14 6:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-14 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-04-14 6:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-14 7:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-14 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-17 17:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-17 17:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-17 17:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-17 20:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090414065303.GA24626@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
--cc=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox