From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] [VOYAGER] x86: make disabling the apics functional instead of a flag
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:09:42 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090414170942.GC12888@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1239724300-16371-11-git-send-email-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
[James Bottomley - Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:51:36AM -0500]
| This allows the elimination of some ifdef guards in setup.c.
| Additionally probe_32.c doesn't need to run through the apics in
| generic_apic_probe() if they're disabled.
|
| Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
| ---
| arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | 6 ++++++
| arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 3 +++
| arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_32.c | 3 +++
| arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 4 +---
| 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
|
| diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
| index 42f2f83..391c464 100644
| --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
| +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
| @@ -246,12 +246,18 @@ static inline int apic_is_clustered_box(void)
| extern u8 setup_APIC_eilvt_mce(u8 vector, u8 msg_type, u8 mask);
| extern u8 setup_APIC_eilvt_ibs(u8 vector, u8 msg_type, u8 mask);
|
| +static inline void disable_APIC(void)
| +{
| + disable_local_APIC();
| + disable_apic = 1;
| +}
|
| #else /* !CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC */
| static inline void lapic_shutdown(void) { }
| #define local_apic_timer_c2_ok 1
| static inline void init_apic_mappings(void) { }
| static inline void disable_local_APIC(void) { }
| +static inline void disable_APIC(void) { }
|
| #endif /* !CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC */
|
| diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
| index f9e830e..aa96dbe 100644
| --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
| +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
| @@ -1539,6 +1539,9 @@ void __init early_init_lapic_mapping(void)
| */
| void __init init_apic_mappings(void)
| {
| + if (disable_apic)
| + return;
| +
No, we shouldn't do that without additional
code review (otherwise we will loose mapping for fake apic page).
And I suspect we get NULL deref on reboot procedure
if kernel was compiled _with_ SMP support but APIC disabled
by kernel option. hmm, can't find this reference in LKML.
I was telling Ingo about my suspicious on smp operations
when APIC is disabled by option and we're safe _only_ 'cause
we have fake mapping page reserved. For example call of
smp_send_stop() in kernel/panic.c if kernel was compiled _with_ SMP
support and then APIC disabled by kernel option.
| if (x2apic) {
| boot_cpu_physical_apicid = read_apic_id();
| return;
| diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_32.c
| index 01eda2a..049d7a0 100644
| --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_32.c
| +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/probe_32.c
| @@ -226,6 +226,9 @@ void __init generic_bigsmp_probe(void)
|
| void __init generic_apic_probe(void)
| {
| + if (disable_apic)
| + return;
| +
Look suspicious too, sorry. If kernel compiled with local apic
set we rely on apic read ops regardless if apic facility
has been disabled by option or not.
I could be missing something /which has quite a high probability magnitude/.
Yinghai help needed :) CC'ed
| if (!cmdline_apic) {
| int i;
| for (i = 0; apic_probe[i]; i++) {
| diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
| index bee0914..13779e2 100644
| --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
| +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
| @@ -770,9 +770,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
| reserve_early_setup_data();
|
| if (acpi_mps_check()) {
| -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
| - disable_apic = 1;
| -#endif
| + disable_APIC();
| setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_APIC);
| }
|
| --
| 1.6.2.1
|
Cyrill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-14 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-14 15:51 [PATCH 00/14] convert voyager over to the x86 quirks model James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 01/14] [VOYAGER] x86: add {safe,hard}_smp_processor_id to smp_ops James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 02/14] [VOYAGER] x86/mca: make mca_nmi_hook external James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 03/14] [VOYAGER] x86: add prefill_possible_map to x86_quirks James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 04/14] [VOYAGER] x86: use boot_cpu_id instead of zero for checking boot processor James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 05/14] [VOYAGER] x86/voyager: Move voyager detection to a new bootparam area James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 06/14] [VOYAGER] x86: eliminate subarchitecture file setup_arch.h James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 07/14] [VOYAGER] x86: eliminate subarchitecture file entry_arch.h James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 08/14] [VOYAGER] x86: eliminate subarchitecture file do_timer.h James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 09/14] [VOYAGER] x86: redo irq2 cascade setup James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 10/14] [VOYAGER] x86: make disabling the apics functional instead of a flag James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 11/14] [VOYAGER] x86/Voyager: add missing QIC call function single gate James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 12/14] [VOYAGER] x86/Voyager: replace inline io area reads with readX accessors James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 13/14] [VOYAGER] x86/voyager: remove direct use of pg0 in favour of early_ioremap() James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 14/14] [VOYAGER] x86/Voyager: Plumb voyager back into the build James Bottomley
2009-04-14 17:09 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2009-04-14 17:44 ` [PATCH 10/14] [VOYAGER] x86: make disabling the apics functional instead of a flag Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-04-15 12:51 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-15 14:12 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-04-14 16:31 ` [PATCH 01/14] [VOYAGER] x86: add {safe,hard}_smp_processor_id to smp_ops Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-04-14 16:54 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-14 16:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-14 16:57 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-14 16:27 ` [PATCH 00/14] convert voyager over to the x86 quirks model Joe Perches
2009-04-14 16:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 23:12 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-15 15:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 21:06 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-16 20:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-19 23:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-19 23:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-20 0:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-20 16:59 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090414170942.GC12888@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox