public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Out-of-order writing by disk drives
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:54:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090414175433.GY14687@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E4CA75.902@rtr.ca>

> Does anyone else here find this rather peculiar?
> 
> The folks who actually care about barriers the most
> (apart from kernel developers) are probably enterprise users.
> 
> And who is most likely to be using RAID and LVM,
> where barriers generally don't work at all ?

The big enterprise users often have a SAN, so the LVM/RAID part is 
hidden somewhere between a block device, together with a lot of 
battery backed cache RAM (so that even running uncached is not too bad)
But on the other hand they also have UPSes, so data loss on power failure
might be not that big a problem for them.

Where I see it as a problem is with virtualization; LVM seems to be the
most sane way to manage file systems for lots of VMs and you likely
want barriers there too.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-14 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-07 20:04 Out-of-order writing by disk drives Anton Ertl
2009-04-14 14:10 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-14 16:33   ` Anton Ertl
2009-04-14 17:24     ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-14 17:40       ` Mark Lord
2009-04-14 17:48         ` Michael Tokarev
2009-04-14 17:54         ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-04-14 18:09           ` Michael Tokarev
2009-04-14 18:50             ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-14 19:27               ` Chris Mason
2009-04-15 12:46                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-17 19:46         ` Folkert van Heusden
2009-04-17 20:29           ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-17 21:07 ` Folkert van Heusden
2009-04-18  9:06   ` Anton Ertl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090414175433.GY14687@one.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox