public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with CREATE_TRACE_POINTS and recursion safety
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:23:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090416022305.GA22378@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904152201390.4459@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > 
> > >   
> > > > I'm having a problem with CREATE_TRACE_POINTS being too indiscriminate.
> > > > The
> > > > trouble is that it not only creates tracepoint definitions for the
> > > > intended
> > > > tracepoints, but any other tracepoint definitions which get included
> > > > incidentally.
> > > > 
> > > > For example, I'm seeing my paravirt tracepoints being instantiated in both
> > > > kernel/sched.o and kernel/irq/manage.o as side-effects of the scheduler
> > > > and
> > > > irq tracepoints being instantiated.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm experimenting with a different scheme, wherein a subsystem defines
> > > > CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS in the .c file where it wants to instantiate the
> > > > tracepoints - rather than CREATE_TRACE_POINTS - and its trace/events/foo.h
> > > > does:
> > > > 
> > > >    #ifdef CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS
> > > >    #undef CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS	/* avoid infinite recursion */
> > > >    #include <trace/instantiate_trace.h>
> > > >    #else
> > > >    #include <trace/define_trace.h>
> > > >    #endif
> > > > 
> > > > where instantiate_trace.h is:
> > > > 
> > > >    #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > > >    #include <trace/define_trace.h>
> > > >    #undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> 
> Have you tried:
> 
> #ifdef CREATE_PVOPS_TRACE_POINTS
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/define_trace.h>
> #undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #endif
> 
> And in your C file do:
> 
> #define CREATE_PVOPS_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/pvops.h>
> 
> ??
> 
> -- Steve

Jeremy brings up an interesting point. Given that we might eventually
include a few tracepoint header files in a given C file, but with the
intent of only "creating" the tracepoint callbacks for few of these, the
global "CREATE_TRACE_POINTS" flag makes little sense and seems like it
will easily lead to link-time errors.

Maybe we could consider requiring something like the following solution :

In the .c file :

#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/subsysa.h>
#undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS

#include <trace/subsysb.h>

Where subsysa has its trace points callbacks created, but subsysb
doesn't. This seems half-way understandable, at least.

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-16  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-16  0:34 Problem with CREATE_TRACE_POINTS and recursion safety Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-16  0:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16  1:06   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-16  2:02     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16  2:23       ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-04-16  2:50         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-16  3:09           ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 11:09             ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-16 13:42               ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16  2:45       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090416022305.GA22378@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox