From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with CREATE_TRACE_POINTS and recursion safety
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 22:23:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090416022305.GA22378@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904152201390.4459@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> > Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > I'm having a problem with CREATE_TRACE_POINTS being too indiscriminate.
> > > > The
> > > > trouble is that it not only creates tracepoint definitions for the
> > > > intended
> > > > tracepoints, but any other tracepoint definitions which get included
> > > > incidentally.
> > > >
> > > > For example, I'm seeing my paravirt tracepoints being instantiated in both
> > > > kernel/sched.o and kernel/irq/manage.o as side-effects of the scheduler
> > > > and
> > > > irq tracepoints being instantiated.
> > > >
> > > > I'm experimenting with a different scheme, wherein a subsystem defines
> > > > CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS in the .c file where it wants to instantiate the
> > > > tracepoints - rather than CREATE_TRACE_POINTS - and its trace/events/foo.h
> > > > does:
> > > >
> > > > #ifdef CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS
> > > > #undef CREATE_FOO_TRACE_POINTS /* avoid infinite recursion */
> > > > #include <trace/instantiate_trace.h>
> > > > #else
> > > > #include <trace/define_trace.h>
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > where instantiate_trace.h is:
> > > >
> > > > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > > > #include <trace/define_trace.h>
> > > > #undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>
> Have you tried:
>
> #ifdef CREATE_PVOPS_TRACE_POINTS
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/define_trace.h>
> #undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #endif
>
> And in your C file do:
>
> #define CREATE_PVOPS_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/pvops.h>
>
> ??
>
> -- Steve
Jeremy brings up an interesting point. Given that we might eventually
include a few tracepoint header files in a given C file, but with the
intent of only "creating" the tracepoint callbacks for few of these, the
global "CREATE_TRACE_POINTS" flag makes little sense and seems like it
will easily lead to link-time errors.
Maybe we could consider requiring something like the following solution :
In the .c file :
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/subsysa.h>
#undef CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/subsysb.h>
Where subsysa has its trace points callbacks created, but subsysb
doesn't. This seems half-way understandable, at least.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-16 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 0:34 Problem with CREATE_TRACE_POINTS and recursion safety Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-16 0:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 1:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-16 2:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 2:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-04-16 2:50 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-16 3:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 11:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-16 13:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 2:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090416022305.GA22378@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox