From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@elastic.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>,
Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: [PATCH] tracepoints : let subsystem nop-out the tracepoints at build time
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:05:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090417030530.GB26612@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E7D0BC.4070700@goop.org>
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@goop.org) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> "all this code" is actually :
>>
>> rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \
>> it_func = rcu_dereference((tp)->funcs); \
>> if (it_func) { \
>> do { \
>> ((void(*)(proto))(*it_func))(args); \
>> } while (*(++it_func)); \
>> } \
>> rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace(); \
>>
>> Which does nothing more than disabling preemption and a for loop to
>> call all the tracepoint handlers. I don't see the big win in laying out
>> the stack to call this code out-of-line; we would just remove the
>> preempt disable and the loop, which are minimal compared to most
>> call stacks.
>>
>
> Well, look at it from my perspective: Ingo has been repeatedly beating
> me up for the overhead pvops adds to a native kernel, where it really is
> just a (direct) function call. I want to instrument each pvop site with
> a tracepoint so I can actually work out which calls are being called how
> frequently to look for new optimisation opportunities.
>
> I would guess the tracepoint code sequence is going to increase the
> impact of each pvop call site by a fair bit, and that's not counting the
> effects the extra register pressure will have. That's a pile of code to
> add.
>
> And frankly, that's fine by me, because I would expect this degree of
> introspection to have some performance hit. But it does make the need
> for per-subsystem tracing Kconfig entries fairly important, because I
> don't think this would be acceptable to ship in a non-debug-everything
> kernel build, even though other tracepoints might be.
>
Agreed. Tracepoints might change the code surrounding the pvops in a
similar fashion as the pvops themselves would change the code.
Therefore, it makes sense to have a Kconfig option to enable the pvops
tracepoints.
In terms of tracepoints (with the DECLARE_TRACE/DEFINE_TRACE semantic),
we could have something like :
in include/trace/pvops.h :
#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_PVOPS_TRACEPOINTS
#define DECLARE_PVOPS_TRACE DECLARE_TRACE
#define DEFINE_PVOPS_TRACE DEFINE_TRACE
#define EXPORT_PVOPS_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL
#define EXPORT_PVOPS_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL
#else /* !CONFIG_PVOPS_TRACEPOINTS */
#define DECLARE_PVOPS_TRACE DECLARE_TRACE_NOP
#define DEFINE_PVOPS_TRACE DEFINE_TRACE_NOP
#define EXPORT_PVOPS_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL_NOP
#define EXPORT_PVOPS_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_NOP
#endif /* CONFIG_PVOPS_TRACEPOINTS */
And then do the declarations/definitions using the new
DECLARE_PVOPS_TRACE / DEFINE_PVOPS_TRACE.
For that you'll need the patch I am attaching below. I'll let Steven
figure out how to tweak TRACE_EVENT() to support this new tracepoint
feature.
>> So basically, tracepoints are already just doing a function call, with a
>> few more bytes for preempt disable and multiple handler support.
>>
>> About the compiler deciding to put the unlikely branch out-of-line, I've
>> never seen any function calls generated just for the sake of saving
>> those few bytes, that would be crazy of the part of the compiler.
>> However, it can (and should) freely put the stack setup in the coldest
>> cache-lines possible, which are reachable by a near jump.
>>
>
> No, it wouldn't generate a call. But if its going to put the code out
> of line into cold cache-lines, then it may as well generate a call.
>
Jumping out-of-line was somewhat faster than calling a function if I
recall well my performance tests. But that's all been done long ago.
And note that whenever the tracer becomes active, the out-of-line code
of busy tracepoints becomes cache-hot, which means that there is no more
cache line fetch to perform, which leaves the stack setup and other
overhead of function call/return vs 2*jump very measurable.
> Anyway, the important point from my perspective is that tracepoint.h
> have no #include dependencies beyond linux/types.h (compiler.h, etc).
>
Is preempt.h a problem ?
Here is the patch.
Mathieu
tracepoints : let subsystem nop-out the tracepoints at build time
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
include/linux/tracepoint.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: linux.trees.git/include/linux/tracepoint.h
===================================================================
--- linux.trees.git.orig/include/linux/tracepoint.h 2009-04-16 22:40:26.000000000 -0400
+++ linux.trees.git/include/linux/tracepoint.h 2009-04-16 22:40:33.000000000 -0400
@@ -37,6 +37,24 @@ struct tracepoint {
#define TP_PROTO(args...) args
#define TP_ARGS(args...) args
+#define DECLARE_TRACE_NOP(name, proto, args) \
+ static inline void _do_trace_##name(struct tracepoint *tp, proto) \
+ { } \
+ static inline void trace_##name(proto) \
+ { } \
+ static inline int register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(proto)) \
+ { \
+ return -ENOSYS; \
+ } \
+ static inline int unregister_trace_##name(void (*probe)(proto)) \
+ { \
+ return -ENOSYS; \
+ }
+
+#define DEFINE_TRACE_NOP(name)
+#define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL_NOP(name)
+#define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_NOP(name)
+
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS
/*
@@ -95,23 +113,11 @@ extern void tracepoint_update_probe_rang
struct tracepoint *end);
#else /* !CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS */
-#define DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args) \
- static inline void _do_trace_##name(struct tracepoint *tp, proto) \
- { } \
- static inline void trace_##name(proto) \
- { } \
- static inline int register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(proto)) \
- { \
- return -ENOSYS; \
- } \
- static inline int unregister_trace_##name(void (*probe)(proto)) \
- { \
- return -ENOSYS; \
- }
-#define DEFINE_TRACE(name)
-#define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(name)
-#define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL(name)
+#define DECLARE_TRACE DECLARE_TRACE_NOP
+#define DEFINE_TRACE DEFINE_TRACE_NOP
+#define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL_NOP
+#define EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_NOP
static inline void tracepoint_update_probe_range(struct tracepoint *begin,
struct tracepoint *end)
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-17 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-14 17:23 [PATCH 0/8] [GIT PULL] TRACE_EVENT for modules Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] tracing: consolidate trace and trace_event headers Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 21:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-14 22:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] tracing: create automated trace defines Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 23:44 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-15 1:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-15 16:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-16 2:34 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-16 2:56 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-16 23:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-17 0:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-17 0:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-17 0:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-17 0:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-17 0:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-17 3:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-04-20 7:12 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-21 15:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-21 17:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-21 17:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-21 17:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-21 20:28 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-21 21:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-21 21:23 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-04-21 21:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-22 5:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-22 6:07 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-22 6:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-22 7:26 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-15 7:04 ` Zhaolei
2009-04-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] tracing: make trace_seq operations available for core kernel Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 19:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-15 2:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] tracing/events: move declarations from trace directory to core include Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] tracing/events: move the ftrace event tracing code to core Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-15 2:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-15 3:40 ` Jiaying Zhang
2009-04-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] tracing/events: convert event call sites to use a link list Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] tracing/events: add export symbols for trace events in modules Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 17:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] tracing/events: add support for modules to TRACE_EVENT Steven Rostedt
2009-04-15 3:22 ` Rusty Russell
2009-04-14 18:15 ` [PATCH 0/8] [GIT PULL] TRACE_EVENT for modules Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 18:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 18:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 18:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 18:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 21:04 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-14 21:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 21:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 21:29 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-04-14 22:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-16 16:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-14 21:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-14 21:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-14 22:33 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-15 8:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 2:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-16 16:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090417030530.GB26612@Krystal \
--to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
--cc=fche@elastic.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mrubin@google.com \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
--cc=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox