public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/fsl_soc: Isolate legacy fsl_spi support to mpc832x_rdb boards
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:23:59 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090417122359.GA6707@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bpr71p1o.fsf_-_@macbook.be.48ers.dk>

Hi Peter,

Sorry for the late response (and don't hesitate to ping me if I
don't answer, some things get lost in my inbox traffic, sorry).

On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:18:43AM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Anton" == Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> writes:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>  Anton> The advantages of this:
>  Anton> - Don't encourage legacy support;
>  Anton> - Less external symbols, less code to compile-in for !MPC832x_RDB
>  Anton>   platforms.
> 
> It's nice with your cleanups, but I wonder how to handle more
> complicated chip select handling than simply toggling a single gpio.
> 
> I have a board (or 2 actually, but they are similar in this regard)
> with a mpc8347 using SPI to a number of addon boards. For signal
> integrity reasons the SPI signals are routed to a MUX, so the chip
> select logic has to set the MUX in addition to controlling the CS line
> of the device.

So that's just a bit complicated GPIO controller. I believe you
should describe it in the device tree and use it's muxed lines as
usual GPIOs.

Something ling

muxed_pio: gpio-controller@.. {
	#gpio-cells = <2>;
	compatible = "..,<board>-muxed-gpios";
	reg = <...>;
	gpios = <...>; <- specify pure BLK1, BLK2, OPT1, OPT2 GPIOs
	gpio-controller;
};

And then,

> I've been using code like this since late 2007, but this patch
> ofcourse breaks it:
> 
> static void thinx_spi_activate_cs(u8 cs, u8 polarity)
> {
> 	static u8 old_cs = 255;
> 
> 	if (cs != old_cs) {
> 		/* mux setup (cs 2:1)*/
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_NOE, 1);
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_SEL0, cs&2);
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_SEL1, cs&4);
> 		gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_MUX_NOE, 0);
> 		old_cs = cs;
> 	}
> 
> 	switch (cs) {
> 	case 0: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_BKL1, polarity); break;
> 	case 1: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_BKL2, polarity); break;
> 	case 2: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_OPT1, polarity); break;
> 	case 3: gpio_set_value(gpio1 + GPIO_SPI_CS_OPT2, polarity); break;
> 	}
> }

^^^ Put this logic into the "<board>-muxed-gpios" GPIO controller
driver.

Then spi node would look like this:

spi-controller@.. {
	...
	gpios = <&muxed_pio cs1 0   /* muxed CS_BLK1 */
		 &muxed_pio cs2 0   /* muxed CS_BLK2 */
		 &muxed_pio cs3 0   /* muxed CS_OPT1 */
		 &muxed_pio cs4 0>; /* muxed CS_OPT2 */
};

Hope this helps,

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-17 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20081205200936.GA19137@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
     [not found] ` <6DC0606C-1CDA-4549-8A63-E3F86010291B@kernel.crashing.org>
2009-01-23 19:49   ` [PATCH resend 0/6] OpenFirmware support for the spi_mpc83xx driver Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50     ` [PATCH 1/6] spi_mpc83xx: Fix sparse warnings Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50     ` [PATCH 2/6] spi_mpc83xx: Rework chip selects handling Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50     ` [PATCH 3/6] spi_mpc83xx: Add OF platform driver bindings Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50     ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc: Add mmc-spi-slot bindings Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50     ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/83xx: Add mmc-spi support via the device tree for MPC8323E-RDB Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-23 19:50     ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/fsl_soc: Isolate legacy fsl_spi support to mpc832x_rdb boards Anton Vorontsov
2009-03-09 16:53     ` [PATCH resend 0/6] OpenFirmware support for the spi_mpc83xx driver Kumar Gala
     [not found]     ` <20090318200048.GD8182@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
2009-04-08  9:18       ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/fsl_soc: Isolate legacy fsl_spi support to mpc832x_rdb boards Peter Korsgaard
2009-04-17  5:13         ` Peter Korsgaard
2009-04-17 12:23         ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090417122359.GA6707@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox