From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756011AbZDTTmf (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:42:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753542AbZDTTm1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:42:27 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:47872 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751356AbZDTTm0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:42:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:30:34 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] tracing: fix recursive test level calculation Message-Id: <20090420123034.ffa17e14.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090420174017.997451662@goodmis.org> References: <20090420173819.957332585@goodmis.org> <20090420174017.997451662@goodmis.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:38:22 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > static int trace_irq_level(void) > { > - return hardirq_count() + softirq_count() + in_nmi(); > + return (hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT) + > + (softirq_count() >> + SOFTIRQ_SHIFT) + > + !!in_nmi(); > } hah, tricked you! IMO hardirq_count() and softirq_count() should do the shift internally. They're terribly misleading at present.