From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754719AbZDUOPP (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:15:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752081AbZDUOPA (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:15:00 -0400 Received: from smtp-out002.kontent.com ([81.88.40.216]:58409 "EHLO smtp-out002.kontent.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750842AbZDUOO7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:14:59 -0400 From: Oliver Neukum To: Jiri Kosina Subject: Re: lockdep report at resume Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:14:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.29-9-default; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Johannes Berg , Dmitry Torokhov , "linux-input" , "linux-kernel" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Oleg Nesterov References: <1234022517.4175.107.camel@johannes.local> <200904211559.43497.oliver@neukum.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904211614.57288.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag 21 April 2009 16:11:03 schrieb Jiri Kosina: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > [ thanks for the analysis Johannes ... involving also Oliver here; > > > really seems like a false positive to me ] > > > > I think he's right. But as a matter of principle I'd like to see > > flush_scheduled_work() avoided where possible, hence the patch. > > I am not entirely sure that this is the same issue as the one from #13136 > of kernel.org bugzilla. Which flush_scheduled_work() do you think triggers it? Regards Oliver