From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754059AbZDVAUx (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:20:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751766AbZDVAUo (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:20:44 -0400 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:60634 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751352AbZDVAUn (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:20:43 -0400 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/25] Do not check for compound pages during the page allocator sanity checks Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Linux Memory Management List , Christoph Lameter , Nick Piggin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lin Ming , Zhang Yanmin , Peter Zijlstra , Pekka Enberg , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <1240266011-11140-21-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> References: <1240266011-11140-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1240266011-11140-21-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> Message-Id: <20090422091456.626E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50 [ja] Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:20:40 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > A number of sanity checks are made on each page allocation and free > including that the page count is zero. page_count() checks for > compound pages and checks the count of the head page if true. However, > in these paths, we do not care if the page is compound or not as the > count of each tail page should also be zero. > > This patch makes two changes to the use of page_count() in the free path. It > converts one check of page_count() to a VM_BUG_ON() as the count should > have been unconditionally checked earlier in the free path. It also avoids > checking for compound pages. > > [mel@csn.ul.ie: Wrote changelog] > Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin > Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter > --- > mm/page_alloc.c | 6 +++--- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index ec01d8f..376d848 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static inline int page_is_buddy(struct page *page, struct page *buddy, > return 0; > > if (PageBuddy(buddy) && page_order(buddy) == order) { > - BUG_ON(page_count(buddy) != 0); > + VM_BUG_ON(page_count(buddy) != 0); > return 1; > } > return 0; > Looks good. > @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page) > { > if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page) | > (page->mapping != NULL) | > - (page_count(page) != 0) | > + (atomic_read(&page->_count) != 0) | > (page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE))) { > bad_page(page); > return 1; > @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ static int prep_new_page(struct page *page, int order, gfp_t gfp_flags) > { > if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page) | > (page->mapping != NULL) | > - (page_count(page) != 0) | > + (atomic_read(&page->_count) != 0) | > (page->flags & PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP))) { > bad_page(page); > return 1; inserting VM_BUG_ON(PageTail(page)) is better?