From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bzolnier@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH linux-2.6-block] block: cleanup patches, take#3
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:10:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090422101038.GA4593@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240331881-28218-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 22 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Upon ack, please pull from the following git tree, which pulls in
> linux-2.6-ide#for-next into linux-2.6-block#for-next and applies this
> patchset on top of it.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git block-cleanup
>
> This is the third take of block-cleanup-patches. Changes from the
> last take[L] are
>
> * All ide changes including L0001-0003 are separated out and merged
> through linux-2.6-ide#for-next and pulled into
> linux-2.6-block#for-next.
>
> * L0015-block-kill-end_request.patch replaced with
> 0012-block-replace-end_request-with-__-blk_end_reques.patch.
>
> * L0016-ubd-simplify-block-request-completion.patch
> L0017-block-clean-up-unnecessary-stuff-from-block-drivers.patch are
> postponed to later patchset.
>
> * 0013-0014 to kill rq->data added.
>
> * Updated to the current #for-next.
>
> 0001-block-merge-blk_invoke_request_fn-into-__blk_run_.patch
> 0002-block-kill-blk_start_queueing.patch
> 0003-block-don-t-set-REQ_NOMERGE-unnecessarily.patch
> 0004-block-cleanup-REQ_SOFTBARRIER-usages.patch
> 0005-block-clean-up-misc-stuff-after-block-layer-timeout.patch
> 0006-block-reorder-request-completion-functions.patch
> 0007-block-reorganize-request-fetching-functions.patch
> 0008-block-kill-blk_end_request_callback.patch
> 0009-block-clean-up-request-completion-API.patch
> 0010-block-move-rq-start_time-initialization-to-blk_rq_.patch
> 0011-block-implement-and-use-__-blk_end_request_all.patch
> 0012-block-replace-end_request-with-__-blk_end_reques.patch
> 0013-block-don-t-abuse-rq-data.patch
> 0014-block-kill-data.patch
>
> 0001-0011 are mostly identical to L0004-0014. L0015 incorrectly
> replaced end_request() with __blk_end_request_all(). 0012 adds
> [__]blk_end_request_cur() and replaces end_request() with it.
>
> With ide changes pulled in, omap is the only user of rq->data, 0013
> makes it use only rq->special and 0014 kills rq->data.
>
> This patchset is on top of
>
> linux-2.6-block#for-next(a95320f3ede3f028837a621715cd352e83ffe7c2)
> + linux-2.6-ide#for-next(2ecf0a57c60dcb588f310d94412118e15c510532)
Looks nice, the only real quibble I have is the one that hch also brings
up. Using a 'locked' argument is always ugly. Otherwise, overall the
patchset is really nice and does good cleanups. Getting rid of ->data is
great as well.
Once we get that settled, pulling into for-2.6.31 will be done.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-22 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-21 16:37 [GIT PATCH linux-2.6-block] block: cleanup patches, take#3 Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 01/14] block: merge blk_invoke_request_fn() into __blk_run_queue() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 02/14] block: kill blk_start_queueing() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 03/14] block: don't set REQ_NOMERGE unnecessarily Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 04/14] block: cleanup REQ_SOFTBARRIER usages Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 05/14] block: clean up misc stuff after block layer timeout conversion Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 06/14] block: reorder request completion functions Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 07/14] block: reorganize request fetching functions Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 17:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-22 10:09 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 1:23 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 08/14] block: kill blk_end_request_callback() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 09/14] block: clean up request completion API Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 17:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-23 1:24 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-23 2:08 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2009-04-23 9:43 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-23 9:59 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 10/14] block: move rq->start_time initialization to blk_rq_init() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 11/14] block: implement and use [__]blk_end_request_all() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 12/14] block: replace end_request() with [__]blk_end_request_cur() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 18:25 ` Joerg Dorchain
2009-04-21 20:35 ` Laurent Vivier
2009-04-22 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-22 16:04 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-21 16:38 ` [PATCH 13/14] block: don't abuse rq->data Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:38 ` [PATCH 14/14] block-kill-data Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:42 ` [PATCH 14/14] block: kill rq->data Tejun Heo
2009-04-22 10:10 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-04-23 2:10 ` [GIT PATCH linux-2.6-block] block: cleanup patches, take#3 Tejun Heo
2009-04-23 6:09 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090422101038.GA4593@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox