From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757115AbZDWLjV (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:39:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754184AbZDWLjL (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:39:11 -0400 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:43805 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753192AbZDWLjK (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:39:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:39:09 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] block bits for 2.6.30-rc3 Message-ID: <20090423113909.GC4593@kernel.dk> References: <20090423103523.GT4593@kernel.dk> <49F04D7C.2040807@garzik.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49F04D7C.2040807@garzik.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 23 2009, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: >> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz (1): >> block: enable by default support for large devices and files on 32-bit archs > > Although I strongly support this change -- is this really appropriate > for -rc3? > > I know it's only a one-line Kconfig change, but still... this does not > seem to fall into the category of "regression fix." It was sitting for about a month before being included, but yes it is probably something that should have gone in before -rc1. I'll defer to Linus, I can easily postpone it to 2.6.31-rc1 it need be. -- Jens Axboe