public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [patch 2/6] appldata: avoid deadlock with appldata_mem
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:46:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090423114725.327324472@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090423114638.865214111@de.ibm.com

[-- Attachment #1: 002-appldata-mem-deadlock.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4512 bytes --]

From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>

The appldata_ops callbacks are called with a spin_lock held. But the
appldata_mem callback then calls all_vm_events(), which calls
get_online_cpus(), which might sleep. This possible deadlock is fixed
by using a mutex instead of a spin_lock.

Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
---

 arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 arch/s390/appldata/appldata_mem.c  |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Index: quilt-2.6/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c
===================================================================
--- quilt-2.6.orig/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c
+++ quilt-2.6/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_base.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static DECLARE_WORK(appldata_work, appld
 /*
  * Ops list
  */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(appldata_ops_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(appldata_ops_mutex);
 static LIST_HEAD(appldata_ops_list);
 
 
@@ -129,14 +129,14 @@ static void appldata_work_fn(struct work
 
 	i = 0;
 	get_online_cpus();
-	spin_lock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 	list_for_each(lh, &appldata_ops_list) {
 		ops = list_entry(lh, struct appldata_ops, list);
 		if (ops->active == 1) {
 			ops->callback(ops->data);
 		}
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 	put_online_cpus();
 }
 
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ appldata_generic_handler(ctl_table *ctl,
 	struct list_head *lh;
 
 	found = 0;
-	spin_lock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 	list_for_each(lh, &appldata_ops_list) {
 		tmp_ops = list_entry(lh, struct appldata_ops, list);
 		if (&tmp_ops->ctl_table[2] == ctl) {
@@ -346,15 +346,15 @@ appldata_generic_handler(ctl_table *ctl,
 		}
 	}
 	if (!found) {
-		spin_unlock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 	ops = ctl->data;
 	if (!try_module_get(ops->owner)) {	// protect this function
-		spin_unlock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 
 	if (!*lenp || *ppos) {
 		*lenp = 0;
@@ -378,11 +378,11 @@ appldata_generic_handler(ctl_table *ctl,
 		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 	if ((buf[0] == '1') && (ops->active == 0)) {
 		// protect work queue callback
 		if (!try_module_get(ops->owner)) {
-			spin_unlock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+			mutex_unlock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 			module_put(ops->owner);
 			return -ENODEV;
 		}
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ appldata_generic_handler(ctl_table *ctl,
 			       "failed with rc=%d\n", ops->name, rc);
 		module_put(ops->owner);
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 out:
 	*lenp = len;
 	*ppos += len;
@@ -433,9 +433,9 @@ int appldata_register_ops(struct appldat
 	if (!ops->ctl_table)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	spin_lock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 	list_add(&ops->list, &appldata_ops_list);
-	spin_unlock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 
 	ops->ctl_table[0].procname = appldata_proc_name;
 	ops->ctl_table[0].maxlen   = 0;
@@ -452,9 +452,9 @@ int appldata_register_ops(struct appldat
 		goto out;
 	return 0;
 out:
-	spin_lock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 	list_del(&ops->list);
-	spin_unlock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 	kfree(ops->ctl_table);
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
@@ -466,9 +466,9 @@ out:
  */
 void appldata_unregister_ops(struct appldata_ops *ops)
 {
-	spin_lock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 	list_del(&ops->list);
-	spin_unlock(&appldata_ops_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&appldata_ops_mutex);
 	unregister_sysctl_table(ops->sysctl_header);
 	kfree(ops->ctl_table);
 }
Index: quilt-2.6/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_mem.c
===================================================================
--- quilt-2.6.orig/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_mem.c
+++ quilt-2.6/arch/s390/appldata/appldata_mem.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static void appldata_get_mem_data(void *
 {
 	/*
 	 * don't put large structures on the stack, we are
-	 * serialized through the appldata_ops_lock and can use static
+	 * serialized through the appldata_ops_mutex and can use static
 	 */
 	static struct sysinfo val;
 	unsigned long ev[NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS];

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-23 11:46 [patch 0/6] s390 patches for 2.6.30-rc3 Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-23 11:46 ` [patch 1/6] ipl: fix compile breakage Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-23 11:46 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2009-04-23 11:46 ` [patch 3/6] /proc/stat idle field for idle cpus Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-23 11:46 ` [patch 4/6] Use tape_generic_offline directly Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-23 11:46 ` [patch 5/6] omit frame pointers on s390 when possible Martin Schwidefsky
2009-04-23 11:46 ` [patch 6/6] update default configuration Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090423114725.327324472@de.ibm.com \
    --to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox