From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: "Peter 'p2' De Schrijver" <peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TWL4030: add function to send PB messages
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:03:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904231503.47287.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240407833-28060-1-git-send-email-peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> This patch moves sending of powerbus messages to a separate function.
Can you add #defines for those register offsets, and use
those as names instead of 0x14/0x15/0x16? And at least
use BIT(x) instead of (1 << x).
If this moves into twl4030_core.c (as I ask about elsewhere),
those registers can just be defines local to that file.
Otherwise this seems ok.
> It also
> makes sure I2C access to the powerbus is enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c
> index 472c35a..df9a94b 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/twl4030-regulator.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/machine.h>
> #include <linux/i2c/twl4030.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>
>
> /*
> @@ -81,6 +82,69 @@ twl4030reg_write(struct twlreg_info *info, unsigned offset, u8 value)
> value, info->base + offset);
> }
>
> +static int twl4030_wait_pb_ready(void)
> +{
> +
> + u8 pb_status;
> + int status, timeout = 10;
> +
> + do {
> + status = twl4030_i2c_read_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_MASTER,
> + &pb_status, 0x14);
> + if (status < 0)
> + return status;
> +
Worth a comment that PB_CFG.BIT(0) == PB_I2C_BUSY ... true if there's
a word queued for the power bus, but not yet sent. And that we assume
no other I2C master is sending such events...
> + if (!(pb_status & 1))
> + return 0;
> +
> + mdelay(1);
> + timeout--;
> +
> + } while (timeout);
> +
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +}
> +
> +static int twl4030_send_pb_msg(unsigned msg)
> +{
> +
> + u8 pb_state;
> + int status;
> +
> + /* save powerbus configuration */
> + status = twl4030_i2c_read_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_MASTER,
> + &pb_state, 0x14);
> + if (status < 0)
> + return status;
> +
> + /* Enable I2C access to powerbus */
> + status = twl4030_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_MASTER,
> + pb_state | (1<<1), 0x14);
> + if (status < 0)
> + return status;
> +
> + status = twl4030_wait_pb_ready();
I'd probably combine wait_pb_ready() with this; not that
this is wrong, but you should only need to set BIT(1) once,
and there's no need to re-read that byte to test BIT(0).
Minor point ... I hate needless I/O. This isn't a critical
path though.
> + if (status < 0)
> + return status;
> +
> + status = twl4030_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_MASTER, msg >> 8,
> + 0x15 /* PB_WORD_MSB */);
> + if (status < 0)
> + return status;
> +
> + status = twl4030_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_MASTER, msg & 0xff,
> + 0x16 /* PB_WORD_LSB */);
> + if (status < 0)
> + return status;
> +
> + status = twl4030_wait_pb_ready();
> + if (status < 0)
> + return status;
> +
> + /* Restore powerbus configuration */
> + return twl4030_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_MASTER, pb_state, 0x14);
> +}
> +
> /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> /* generic power resource operations, which work on all regulators */
> @@ -177,13 +241,7 @@ static int twl4030reg_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned mode)
> if (!(status & (P3_GRP | P2_GRP | P1_GRP)))
> return -EACCES;
>
> - status = twl4030_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_MASTER,
> - message >> 8, 0x15 /* PB_WORD_MSB */ );
> - if (status >= 0)
> - return status;
> -
> - return twl4030_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_MASTER,
> - message, 0x16 /* PB_WORD_LSB */ );
> + return twl4030_send_pb_msg(message);
> }
>
> /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> --
> 1.5.6.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-23 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1240407833-28060-1-git-send-email-peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com>
2009-04-23 22:03 ` David Brownell [this message]
2009-04-24 9:25 ` [PATCH] TWL4030: add function to send PB messages Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
2009-04-23 13:08 Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
2009-04-23 14:52 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200904231503.47287.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.de-schrijver@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox