public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup: Remove unused __REQ_NR_BITS from enum rq_flag_bits
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:11:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090427121128.GB4593@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904271735.02007.knikanth@suse.de>

On Mon, Apr 27 2009, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009 17:16:33 Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27 2009, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
> > > The __REQ_NR_BITS  was being used by blk_dump_rq_flags() long back, while
> > > printing the individual request flag bits as strings to limit to the used
> > > bits. But it does not use it now. Remove unused enum.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > > index ba54c83..f41abbb 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > > @@ -118,7 +118,6 @@ enum rq_flag_bits {
> > >  	__REQ_COPY_USER,	/* contains copies of user pages */
> > >  	__REQ_INTEGRITY,	/* integrity metadata has been remapped */
> > >  	__REQ_NOIDLE,		/* Don't anticipate more IO after this one */
> > > -	__REQ_NR_BITS,		/* stops here */
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  #define REQ_RW		(1 << __REQ_RW)
> >
> > Lets turn it into something useful instead. It's meant to catch someone
> > adding too many flags, how about something like this:
> >
> > Untested ;-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> > index d73eb76..e62ef94 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-core.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> > @@ -2159,6 +2159,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kblockd_schedule_work);
> >
> >  int __init blk_dev_init(void)
> >  {
> > +	BUILD_BUG_ON(__REQ_NR_BITS > 8 * sizeof(int));
> > +
> >  	kblockd_workqueue = create_workqueue("kblockd");
> >  	if (!kblockd_workqueue)
> >  		panic("Failed to create kblockd\n");
> 
> Good idea. How about this?

That's fine, better explains the check. It doesn't matter in practice
though, since we will be restricted to 32 flags even on 64-bit archs (as
long as we support 32-bit archs).

I'll add it, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe


      reply	other threads:[~2009-04-27 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-27 11:35 [PATCH] Cleanup: Remove unused __REQ_NR_BITS from enum rq_flag_bits Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-04-27 11:46 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-27 12:05   ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2009-04-27 12:11     ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090427121128.GB4593@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=knikanth@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox