From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:05:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090427170528.GD6781@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0904271027580.24293@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:39:29AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > it is processed before I can release the code.
> > >
> > > When will it be merged by mainline kernel? Do you have a plan?
> >
> > Patent applications tend to be measured in years. Also I'm not sure
> > we really want patented algorithms in the kernel anyways if it can
> > be avoided. So the patent probably makes it impractical to use this
> > thing at all.
>
> Once it is filed then I can post it, I do not need to wait till it is
> done.
Simply preparing a patent application for filing can take a
non-trivial amount of time. I'd suggest that you should ask your
patent attorney whether he is planning on filing internationally, or
just in the US.
If he (or she) is only planning only in the US, unlike the rest of the
world, the US is not a first-to-file, so as long as you have proof of
when you invented it --- for example, getting a description of your
invention notarized --- you might be able to get clearance from your
legal department to submit the patch while the patent application is
getting prepared.
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_to_file_and_first_to_invent
If your attorney is not willing to do this, all I can suggest is that
you ask him to ask his opposite numbers at other open source companies
how they handle this situation at a future Linux Foundation Legal
Summit. I can assure you there are far more rational ways of handling
this than forcing people to wait until the patent application is
actually filed.
> And what the hell do you mean about not using patents?? We have several
> patents in the kernel. Have you ever heard of the Open Invention Network?
>
> http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/
>
> This patent will go under the Open Source patent pool to help
> protect against patent attacks against Linux, et. al.
>
> Yes, the Open Source community can file their own patents. The more
> patents owned by the Open Source community, the better.
No argument here. It's just that there are better ways of doing
things than waiting until after the patent application is fully
drafted, all of the engineering drawings are done, the language of
patent claims are fine-tuned, etc., all of which can take a long, LONG
time, depending on how busy your patent attorney and his (or her)
staff might happen to be.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-27 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-22 9:11 Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer Huang Ying
2009-04-22 9:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 10:16 ` Robert Richter
2009-04-22 10:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 11:35 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-22 11:30 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-24 6:06 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-24 10:09 ` Robert Richter
2009-04-24 13:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-27 7:49 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-27 7:53 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-27 14:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-27 14:44 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-04-27 14:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-27 16:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-04-27 17:05 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2009-04-27 20:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-27 14:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-27 14:36 ` Patenting kernel patches was " Andi Kleen
2009-04-27 14:49 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-27 15:33 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-27 0:58 ` Huang Ying
2009-04-22 11:20 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-22 15:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-22 15:58 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-29 19:15 ` Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer II Andi Kleen
2009-04-30 7:38 ` 32bit mce unification (Re: Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer II) Hidetoshi Seto
2009-04-22 11:11 ` Re-implement MCE log ring buffer as per-CPU ring buffer Andi Kleen
2009-04-24 5:51 ` Huang Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090427170528.GD6781@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox