From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756040AbZD1S0R (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:26:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753905AbZD1S0A (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:26:00 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46598 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753446AbZD1SZ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:25:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:21:07 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Borislav Petkov Cc: greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dougthompson@xmission.com, borislav.petkov@amd.com, Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/21] amd64_edac: add msr accessors operating on all cpus Message-Id: <20090428112107.af44e6db.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1240931173-17477-15-git-send-email-borislav.petkov@amd.com> References: <1240931173-17477-1-git-send-email-borislav.petkov@amd.com> <1240931173-17477-15-git-send-email-borislav.petkov@amd.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:06:06 +0200 Borislav Petkov wrote: > From: Doug Thompson > > Signed-off-by: Doug Thompson > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov > --- > drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c > index ac4e265..49c0ce0 100644 > --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c > +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c > @@ -3121,4 +3121,46 @@ static struct pci_dev *pci_get_related_function(unsigned int vendor, > return dev; > } > > +/* stolen from msr.c - the calls in msr.c could be exported */ It would be preferable to export the functions from msr.c! We do have a number of exported MSR manipulation functions in x86. > +struct msr_command { > + int cpu; > + int err; > + u32 reg; > + u32 data[2]; > +}; > + > +static void smp_wrmsr(void *cmd_block) > +{ > + struct msr_command *cmd = cmd_block; > + wrmsr(cmd->reg, cmd->data[0], cmd->data[1]); > +} > + > +static void smp_rdmsr(void *cmd_block) > +{ > + struct msr_command *cmd = cmd_block; > + rdmsr(cmd->reg, cmd->data[0], cmd->data[1]); > +} > + > +static void do_wrmsr(int cpu, u32 reg, u32 eax, u32 edx) > +{ > + struct msr_command cmd; > + > + cmd.cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); > + cmd.reg = reg; > + cmd.data[0] = eax; > + cmd.data[1] = edx; > + on_each_cpu(smp_wrmsr, &cmd, 1); > +} > + > +static void do_rdmsr(int cpu, u32 reg, u32 *eax, u32 *edx) > +{ > + struct msr_command cmd; > + > + cmd.cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); > + cmd.reg = reg; > + on_each_cpu(smp_rdmsr, &cmd, 1); > + *eax = cmd.data[0]; > + *edx = cmd.data[1]; > +} I'm all confused. We interrupt _all_ CPUs and get each one of them to write to cmd.data[0] and cmd.data[1]. So what we end up returning is the result which was provided by the last CPU which got there, whichever CPU that was. Am I mising something, or is this all totally screwy?