From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [spi-devel-general] [PATCH v2] spi: Add support for the OpenCores SPI controller.
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 08:31:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090429063104.GB7784@avionic-design.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904281354.12192.david-b@pacbell.net>
* David Brownell wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 April 2009, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > > Is this the http://www.opencores.org/?do=project&who=spi core?
> > >
> > > Yes, it is.
> > >
> > > > Its summary says "Variable length of transfer word up to 32 bits";
> > > > does that mean "configurable when core is synthesized" instead of
> > > > truly "variable"?
> >
> > This is indeed configured at synthesis time.
>
> Now I'm confused again. Thierry says (below) that the number of bits
> can be set per-"transfer".
>
> Now, I can easily understand that a *maximum* would be configured
> at synthesis time ... if there's a 32-bit CPU or DMA engine, it'd
> make very limited sense to interact using 128-bit I/O words.
I can't really comment on the synthesis because I'm not involved with that
part. What I was saying that the core provides a field in the control
register which defines the number of bits to transfer from/to the
transmit/receive registers. The maximum number of bits that can be specified
in this way is 128.
> Is there both a configurable maximum, *and* a word-size setting that
> can be changed on the fly? That's what I would expect; it's what
> most other designs do. The only time I've seen fixed "you must use
> N-bit words" designs is on cost-eradicated 8-bit microcontrollers.
Perhaps that maximum number of bits that can be set through the control
register is what can be configured at synthesis time.
> - Dave
Thierry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-29 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-26 8:07 [PATCH] spi: Add support for the OpenCores SPI controller Thierry Reding
2009-03-30 8:44 ` Florian Fainelli
2009-04-04 19:27 ` David Brownell
2009-04-28 11:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Thierry Reding
2009-04-28 11:15 ` [spi-devel-general] " Thierry Reding
2009-04-28 11:58 ` David Brownell
2009-04-28 12:20 ` Thierry Reding
2009-04-28 13:41 ` Florian Fainelli
2009-04-28 20:54 ` David Brownell
2009-04-29 6:31 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2009-04-29 9:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2009-04-28 21:03 ` David Brownell
2009-04-29 6:22 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090429063104.GB7784@avionic-design.de \
--to=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=florian@openwrt.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox