From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] workqueue_trace: Add max execution time mesurement for per worklet
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:49:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090429154913.GA6406@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090429083654.7ecf0100.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 08:36:54AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:45:28 -0400 (EDT) Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > * pointer to the real address.
> > >
> > > But the output formatting is the same: address, offset, size, modname.
> > >
> > > I found it a bit annoying, so I proposed the following patch recently:
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/15/310
>
> This looks OK. I'd assumed it was merged. Was there a problem with it?
No, I tested it without problem.
> > > And someone came with a better idea, IMO:
> > >
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/17/105
> >
> > Note,
> >
> > If these ever do get merged, I would be happy to convert ftrace to use
> > them to replace my version.
>
> I spose I could use magic powers to sneak it into .30?
Thanks :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-29 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 10:51 [PATCH 0/4] workqueue_trace: Add max execution time mesurement for per worklet Zhaolei
2009-04-28 10:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] tracing/workqueue: turn workfunc_stats::inserted into unsigned int Zhaolei
2009-04-28 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] tracing/workqueue: Avoid accessing task_struct's member variable in stat file read Zhaolei
2009-04-28 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] tracing/workqueue: Use list_for_each_entry instrad of list_for_each_entry_safe in probe_workqueue_destruction() Zhaolei
2009-04-28 10:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] tracing/workqueue: Add max execution time mesurement for per worklet Zhaolei
2009-04-28 17:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-30 1:15 ` Zhaolei
2009-04-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] workqueue_trace: " Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-29 7:06 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-29 13:33 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-29 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-29 13:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-29 15:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-29 15:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-04-29 19:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-30 1:10 ` [PATCH 0/4] workqueue_trace: Add max execution time mesurementfor " Zhaolei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090429154913.GA6406@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
--cc=zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).