linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:25:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090430072556.GD16737@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090429220037.GA8604@srcf.ucam.org>


* Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:39:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> 
> > I don't know about XP's copy of intelppm.sys, but this would seem to confirm
> > that WS03 and WS08 check _PPC at boot time.
> 
> Ok, so that makes things interesting. From what we know about the 
> T60 (and based on Ingo's report), _PPC may evaluate to 2 on 
> bootup. However, if this is ignored then later notifications are 
> correct. This implies that Windows either ignores the initial 
> evaluation or does something that triggers a notification.
> 
> The only notifications appear to be sent from event methods, so 
> there's nothing obvious there that we can trigger. I'm actually 
> quite confused by this now. Ingo, if you re-add that block, does 
> your system stop working again?

That box is working fine now doing ~100 bootup tests per day - so if 
you send me a suitably changelogged patch (revert?) i can apply that 
to tip:out-of-tree for testing and we'll find out quickly whether 
the box stops working.

OTOH, if you rely on me figuring out which patch to revert and what 
to do, it will take an indeterminate amount of time - together with 
all the other items in my 'would be nice to hack on, given a bit of 
free time' queue :)

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-30  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-15 22:53 [PATCH] acpi: Fix regression where _PPC is not read at boot even when ignore_ppc=0 Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-16  0:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-16 10:01   ` Thomas Renninger
2009-04-16 10:32     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 17:42     ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-16 18:49       ` Thomas Renninger
2009-04-16 22:45       ` Matthew Garrett
2009-04-20  5:13         ` Len Brown
2009-04-20  9:13           ` Thomas Renninger
2009-04-20 10:45             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 13:19               ` Thomas Renninger
2009-04-29 14:48                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 21:43                 ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-30  9:07                   ` Thomas Renninger
2009-04-30  9:17                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-20 22:18             ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-04-28 19:33         ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-28 19:53           ` Matthew Garrett
2009-04-28 20:24             ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-29 21:39             ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-04-29 22:00               ` Matthew Garrett
2009-04-30  7:25                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-04-30  9:54                   ` Matthew Garrett
2009-04-30 11:10                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-30 11:13                       ` Matthew Garrett
2009-05-15 19:12                         ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-06-02 23:21                           ` Darrick J. Wong
2009-06-07 10:05                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-15  0:32                               ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-02-16 22:07                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-16 22:26                                   ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-02-18  9:02                                     ` Len Brown
2010-02-18 18:28                                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2010-02-19  6:12                                         ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090430072556.GD16737@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).