Re: [PATCH] Fix dirty page accounting in redirty_page_for_writepage()

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > Could you cite a specific example / situation where you'd use __xxx
> > ops?
> 
> Well the cpu alloc v3 patchset (already cited) included numerous 
> locations. Sure wish we could move much of the core stats over to 
> percpu ops. Here is a list of some stats patches that do not need 
> irq disable.
> 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1128
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1132
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1134
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1138
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1139
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1145 VM stats
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1160 NFS stats
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1161 Genhd stats
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1163 Socket inuse counter
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/1164 SRCU

nice. Do these all get called with irqs off, all the time?

	Ingo