From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: monstr@monstr.eu
Cc: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Memory limits - mm_segment_t - MAKE_MM_SEG
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:50:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904301550.35112.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F85C27.9000308@monstr.eu>
On Wednesday 29 April 2009, Michal Simek wrote:
> I look at some things which I need to clear for MMU Microblaze patches and
> I would like to know your opinion about.
>
> First of all I found that almost all archs use MAKE_MM_SEG macro which
> should be good to move to generic location (asm-generic/uaccess.h ? )
> #define MAKE_MM_SEG(s) ((mm_segment_t) { (s) })
I have a generic uaccess.h queued up, which I'm planning to submit for
2.6.30 that includes this.
> The second thing is about place where is stored limit for processes -> mm_segment_t structure
>
> Where is the proper location for storing mm_segment_t? Some arch use
> thread_info some of them thread_struct
The method that is used here is different on some architectures.
Most of them use the address limit, which is a property of the
thread, and sensibly belongs into the thread_info. s390 and possibly
others have separate address spaces for user access and use a CPU
feature for this, which belongs into thread_struct.
> Here is the small table for cpus which are in linux kernel and location and type for them.
> The most of them uses thread_info structure for it and name is addr_limit.
> The location of mm_segment_t is different too -> we should move it to any generic location too.
> What do you think?
Sounds fair to me. I think uaccess.h is the best place for this, or maybe
a new mm_segment.h, but not segment.h which is used traditionally for
real segments on x86.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-30 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-29 13:54 Memory limits - mm_segment_t - MAKE_MM_SEG Michal Simek
2009-04-29 14:03 ` Michal Simek
2009-04-30 13:50 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-04-30 14:28 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200904301550.35112.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=john.williams@petalogix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox