public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	cluster-devel@redhat.com, swhiteho@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] configfs: Rework configfs_depend_item() locking and make lockdep happy
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:20:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090430172014.GA2762@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090430091828.GB13896@hawkmoon.kerlabs.com>

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:18:28AM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> On 29/04/09 11:52 -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 07:18:33PM +0100, Louis Rilling wrote:
> > > configfs_depend_item() recursively locks all inodes mutex from configfs root to
> > > the target item, which makes lockdep unhappy. The purpose of this recursive
> > > locking is to ensure that the item tree can be safely parsed and that the target
> > > item, if found, is not about to leave.
> > > 
> > > This patch reworks configfs_depend_item() locking using configfs_dirent_lock.
> > > Since configfs_dirent_lock protects all changes to the configfs_dirent tree, and
> > > protects tagging of items to be removed, this lock can be used instead of the
> > > inodes mutex lock chain.
> > > This needs that the check for dependents be done atomically with
> > > CONFIGFS_USET_DROPPING tagging.
> > 
> > 	These patches are now in the 'lockdep' branch of the configfs
> > tree.  I'm planning to send them in the next merge window.  I've made
> > one change.
> > 
> > > + * Note: items in the middle of attachment start with s_type = 0
> > > + * (configfs_new_dirent()), and configfs_make_dirent() (called from
> > > + * create_dir()) sets s_type = CONFIGFS_DIR|CONFIGFS_USET_CREATING. In both
> > > + * cases the item is ignored. Since s_type is an int, we rely on the CPU to
> > > + * atomically update the value, without making configfs_make_dirent() take
> > > + * configfs_dirent_lock.
> > 
> > 	I've added configfs_dirent_lock in configfs_make_dirent(),
> > because it is not safe at all to rely on the fact that s_type is an int.
> > It's an atomic set on one CPU, but there's no guarantee that it's seen
> > correctly on other CPUs.  Plus, there's no real need for speed here.  So
> > we properly take configfs_dirent_lock around s_type in
> > configfs_make_dirent(), and that ensures we see things correctly on SMP.
> 
> Agreed, I was going to suggest something like this. Actually I'd push the
> initialization of s_type down to configfs_new_dirent(), so that s_type either
> is always NULL, or always shows the correct type of object.

	0, not "NULL", but yeah I think that's a good plan.

Joel

-- 

"If at first you don't succeed, cover all traces that you tried."
                                                        -Unknown

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-30 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-28 18:18 [PATCH v2] Make lockdep happy with configfs Louis Rilling
2009-01-28 18:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] configfs: Silence lockdep on mkdir() and rmdir() Louis Rilling
2009-01-28 18:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] configfs: Rework configfs_depend_item() locking and make lockdep happy Louis Rilling
2009-04-29 18:52   ` Joel Becker
2009-04-30  9:18     ` Louis Rilling
2009-04-30 17:20       ` Joel Becker [this message]
2009-04-30 17:30         ` Joel Becker
2009-05-04 10:20           ` Louis Rilling
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-18 11:15 [PATCH] configfs: Silence lockdep on mkdir(), rmdir() and configfs_depend_item() Louis Rilling
2008-12-18 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] configfs: Rework configfs_depend_item() locking and make lockdep happy Louis Rilling
2009-01-28  4:13   ` Joel Becker
2009-01-28 10:32     ` Louis Rilling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090430172014.GA2762@mail.oracle.com \
    --to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox