From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel IOMMU Pass Through Support
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:05:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090501000509.GA20743@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49FA3650.8030307@xenotime.net>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:37:52PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:19:57 -0700
> > Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The patch adds kernel parameter intel_iommu=pt to set up pass through mode in
> >> context mapping entry. This disables DMAR in linux kernel; but KVM still runs on
> >> VT-d and interrupt remapping still works.
> >>
> >> In this mode, kernel uses swiotlb for DMA API functions but other VT-d
> >> functionalities are enabled for KVM. KVM always uses multi level translation
> >> page table in VT-d. By default, pass though mode is disabled in kernel.
> >>
> >> This is useful when people don't want to enable VT-d DMAR in kernel but still
> >> want to use KVM and interrupt remapping for reasons like DMAR performance
> >> concern or debug purpose.
> >>
> >
> > The patch is now in linux-next and broke my build.
> >
> > arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `iommu_setup':
> > arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c:215: undefined reference to `iommu_pass_through'
> > arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `pci_swiotlb_init':
> > arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:74: undefined reference to `iommu_pass_through'
> >
> > Because iommu_pass_through is defined in drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c and
> >
> > # CONFIG_DMAR is not set
> >
> > I'll need to cook up some local hack to work around that.
> >
>
> Patch just went to linux-next mailing list (but should have also
> gone to lkml):
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=124113213400748&w=2
That's right. I just posted this patch to fix the compiling errors.
>
>
> >
> > Also, the patch in linux-next (but not the one which I'm replying to
> > here does:
> >
> > : --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> > : +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> > : @@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ again:
> > : return page_address(page);
> > : }
> > :
> > : +extern int iommu_pass_through;
> > : +
> >
> > Which is wrong and unnecessary - the variable was already declared in a
> > header file.
> >
> > scripts/checkpatch.pl would have warned you about this error, but
> > apparently neither you nor the people who reviewed or merged the patch
> > bother to use it.
Actually checkpatch.pl doesn't report anything wrong with this statement.
The following patch removes this statement on the top of linux-next.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
pci-dma.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
index 8cad0d8..049005e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
@@ -160,8 +162,6 @@ again:
return page_address(page);
}
-extern int iommu_pass_through;
-
/*
* See <Documentation/x86_64/boot-options.txt> for the iommu kernel parameter
* documentation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-01 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090327212241.234500000@intel.com>
2009-03-28 14:24 ` [patch 0/4] Intel IOMMU Supspend/Resume Support Andrew Lutomirski
2009-03-30 23:01 ` David Woodhouse
[not found] ` <20090327212321.520992000@intel.com>
2009-04-03 12:37 ` [patch 4/4] Intel IOMMU Suspend/Resume Support - Code Clean Up David Woodhouse
[not found] ` <20090327212321.070229000@intel.com>
2009-04-16 0:19 ` [PATCH] Intel IOMMU Pass Through Support Fenghua Yu
2009-04-16 2:13 ` Han, Weidong
2009-04-19 10:05 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-20 17:27 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-05-13 23:13 ` [PATCH] Fix Intel IOMMU Compilation Warnings on IA64 Fenghua Yu
2009-05-14 15:17 ` David Woodhouse
2009-05-14 15:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-14 17:59 ` Fenghua Yu
2009-06-18 18:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] IOMMU Identity Mapping Support: iommu_identity_mapping definition Fenghua Yu
2009-06-18 18:08 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2009-06-18 18:13 ` Chris Wright
2009-06-18 18:14 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-06-18 18:25 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2009-06-18 18:31 ` Chris Wright
2009-06-18 18:41 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2009-06-18 18:50 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-06-18 18:51 ` Chris Wright
2009-06-18 19:09 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-06-25 0:38 ` [PATCH] IA64 Compilation Error Fix for Intel IOMMU Identity Mapping Support Fenghua Yu
2009-06-25 1:00 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-06-25 4:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Fenghua Yu
2009-06-25 4:48 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-06-25 7:11 ` David Woodhouse
2009-06-25 21:52 ` David Woodhouse
2009-06-25 21:56 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-06-26 18:21 ` David Woodhouse
2009-06-25 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-25 22:46 ` Tony Luck
2009-06-25 23:43 ` Chris Wright
2009-06-26 1:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-26 1:52 ` Chris Wright
2009-06-26 2:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-26 2:08 ` Chris Wright
2009-06-26 11:15 ` David Woodhouse
2009-06-27 0:03 ` Chris Wright
2009-06-27 11:44 ` David Woodhouse
2009-06-18 18:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] IOMMU Identity Mapping Support: iommu_identity_mapping definition Chris Wright
2009-06-18 18:28 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-06-18 18:34 ` Chris Wright
2009-07-04 18:40 ` David Woodhouse
2009-05-20 17:42 ` [PATCH] Time out for possible dead loops during queued invalidation wait Fenghua Yu
2009-05-27 5:51 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 22:40 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-05-27 22:48 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 23:25 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-05-27 23:51 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-28 0:47 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-06-18 18:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] IOMMU Identity Mapping Support: Intel IOMMU implementation Fenghua Yu
2009-06-18 19:15 ` Chris Wright
2009-06-18 19:40 ` Yu, Fenghua
2009-06-18 20:02 ` Chris Wright
2009-06-19 20:47 ` [PATCH v2] IOMMU Identity Mapping Support (drivers/pci/intel_iommu.c) Fenghua Yu
2009-04-30 23:29 ` [PATCH] Intel IOMMU Pass Through Support Andrew Morton
2009-04-30 23:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-05-01 0:00 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-01 0:57 ` Fenghua Yu
2009-05-01 0:05 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2009-05-01 0:14 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090501000509.GA20743@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=weidong.han@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox