From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761298AbZEAOMZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2009 10:12:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751000AbZEAOMP (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2009 10:12:15 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f176.google.com ([209.85.219.176]:61442 "EHLO mail-ew0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754491AbZEAOMO (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2009 10:12:14 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=q8Vu1kHphLsTEzeNq3mvM9AbYLJsHHqZF08v0QejK591VniUPM2xTXBXR4Qo5nzbbo YrscIuzKNdPFQlpLkJiodrnmYy8vrMwbSbooOGsM+/eL+W7WrN0nE/38+zPotHz2n+OB rvLzclY/ubX8b/co+yZq0XxgYe+T+F0eAglPA= Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:12:09 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Thomas Meyer Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML , Jeff Mahoney , ReiserFS Development List , Chris Mason , Alexander Beregalov , Alessio Igor Bogani , J@pimp.vs19.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] kill-the-BKL/reiserfs3: performance improvements, faster than Bkl based scheme Message-ID: <20090501141208.GJ6011@nowhere> References: <1241145862-21700-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20090501053540.GC5983@elte.hu> <1241180316.3783.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1241180316.3783.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:18:36PM +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote: > Am Freitag, den 01.05.2009, 07:35 +0200 schrieb Ingo Molnar: > > > > I've pulled it and have also merged -rc4 into the kill-the-BKL tree, > > which can picked up from here: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git core/kill-the-BKL > > > > So for comparative benchmarking, vanilla v2.6.30-rc4 (which has the > > BKL) can be compared against latest kill-the-BKL > > Hi, > > Kernel gets soft-locked-up in somewhere in initrd: > > See > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0524.jpg > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0525.jpg > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0526.jpg > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0527.jpg > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0528.jpg > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/img_0529.jpg Looks like someone owns the kernel lock and is sleeping with the assumption it releases the lock, like the old bkl did. > config is: > http://m3y3r.de/bilder/config-2.6.30-rc4-ktb Thanks, I will try it out once I have some time. > greets > thomas > >