Re: [PATCH 0/3] add tracepoints docbook (take #2)

[Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:29:08PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> The following patches add a new tracepoint docbook. Since tracepoints can
> be defined by various macros and in various files, I think it important
> to clearly document the available tracepoints, as Andrew has pointed out.
> This helps us see what we have and what we don't have. If this patch is
> accepted, I hope that others will add docbook style comments, so we can
> have a complete accounting of the kernel's tracepoints.
> 

hi,

i'd also like to get some agreement that future tracepoints need to
have this sort of documentation included when they are submitted. Also,
I'd like people who have already submitted tracepoints to go back and
add this kind of documentation. I'll volunteer to police the effort if
we agree it should be done.

thanks,

-Jason