public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] timer: move calc_load to softirq
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:24:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090502122459.ccc870fc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090502190545.489264416@linutronix.de>

On Sat, 02 May 2009 19:06:35 -0000 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> xtime_lock is held write locked across calc_load() which iterates over
> all online CPUs. That can cause long latencies for xtime_lock readers
> on large SMP systems. The load average calculation is an rough
> estimate anyway so there is no real need to protect the readers
> vs. the update. It's not a problem when the avenrun array is updated
> while a reader copies the values.
> 
> Move the calculation to the softirq and reduce the xtime_lock write
> locked section. This also reduces the interrupts off section.
> 
> ...
>
> +static atomic_t avenrun_ticks;
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(avenrun_lock);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, avenrun_calculate);
> +
>  static unsigned long
>  calc_load(unsigned long load, unsigned long exp, unsigned long active)
>  {
> @@ -1143,23 +1145,47 @@ calc_load(unsigned long load, unsigned l
>  
>  /*
>   * calc_load - given tick count, update the avenrun load estimates.
> - * This is called while holding a write_lock on xtime_lock.
>   */
> -static void calc_global_load(unsigned long ticks)
> +static void calc_global_load(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned long active_tasks; /* fixed-point */
> -	static int count = LOAD_FREQ;
> +	unsigned long active_tasks = nr_active() * FIXED_1;
>  
> -	count -= ticks;
> -	if (unlikely(count < 0)) {
> -		active_tasks = nr_active() * FIXED_1;
> -		do {
> -			avenrun[0] = calc_load(avenrun[0], EXP_1, active_tasks);
> -			avenrun[1] = calc_load(avenrun[1], EXP_5, active_tasks);
> -			avenrun[2] = calc_load(avenrun[2], EXP_15, active_tasks);
> -			count += LOAD_FREQ;
> -		} while (count < 0);
> +	avenrun[0] = calc_load(avenrun[0], EXP_1, active_tasks);
> +	avenrun[1] = calc_load(avenrun[1], EXP_5, active_tasks);
> +	avenrun[2] = calc_load(avenrun[2], EXP_15, active_tasks);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Check whether do_timer has set avenrun_calculate. The variable is
> + * cpu local so we avoid cache line bouncing of avenrun_lock and
> + * avenrun_ticks. avenrun_lock protects the avenrun calculation.
> + */
> +static void check_calc_load(void)
> +{
> +	int ticks, *calc = &__get_cpu_var(avenrun_calculate);
> +
> +	if (!*calc)
> +		return;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&avenrun_lock);
> +	ticks = atomic_read(&avenrun_ticks);
> +	if (ticks >= LOAD_FREQ) {
> +		atomic_sub(LOAD_FREQ, &avenrun_ticks);
> +		calc_global_load();
>  	}
> +	spin_unlock(&avenrun_lock);
> +	*calc = 0;
> +}

I wonder if we really really need avenrun_lock.  Various bits of code
(eg net/sched/em_meta.c) cheerily read avenrun[] without locking.

avenrun_lock could be made static within check_calc_load().



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-02 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-02 19:06 [patch 0/3] move calc_load to softirq Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-02 19:06 ` [patch 1/3] timers: use function instead of macro for calc_load Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-07 18:16   ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-05-02 19:06 ` [patch 2/3] timer: move calc_load to softirq Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-02 19:24   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-05-02 19:54     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-07 18:18       ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-05-02 19:06 ` [patch 3/3] tiemrs: cleanup avenrun users Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090502122459.ccc870fc.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox