public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	David VomLehn <dvomlehn@cisco.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, <greg@kroah.com>,
	<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] initdev:kernel: Asynchronously-discovered device synchronization, v5
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:45:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090504074522.13f1ed77@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0905041026560.2961-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

On Mon, 4 May 2009 10:30:06 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:

> On Sun, 3 May 2009, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> > > Perhaps with some enterprise systems, it is preferred to have the 
> > > system fail with an explicit error message rather than wait 
> > > indefinitely...
> > 
> > actually, in an enterprise system, you want to reboot.
> > The bootloader might boot a different kernel the next time
> > that is known to work.
> > (for example, the current kernel might have been booted with the
> > "once" grub option)
> 
> Which makes it imperative that the system knows when all the block
> devices have been probed, so it can stop waiting.
> 
> > > How does Arjan's async boot system tell use when all discovery is
> > > complete?  AFAICS, it only tells you when all its async tasks are
> > > finished.  But device discovery and registration sometimes use
> > > other asynchronous techniques which Arjan's code is unaware of.
> > > Examples: the USB khubd thread, the USB mass-storage scanning
> > > thread, and the SCSI async-scanning thread.
> > 
> > for normal device probing we already have infrastructure though...
> > wait_for_device_probe, driver_probe_done and friends...
> > (the scsi scanning thread is being converted to the async
> > infrastructure btw)
> > 
> > do we need to invent more ?
> 
> I suppose the usb-storage scanning thread could also be converted to 
> the async infrastructure, although I haven't heard of anybody working 
> on it.
> 
> But the USB hub driver's thread (khubd) cannot be converted.  It is 
> central to the discovery of USB-based block devices.  How would you 
> handle that?

take a ref in the driver_probe_done() sense, and release it when you
know you're done probing....

at that point all existing infrastructure will just work.


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-04 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-02  2:25 [PATCH 1/5] initdev:kernel: Asynchronously-discovered device synchronization, v5 David VomLehn
2009-05-02 13:31 ` Sergey Vlasov
2009-05-02 14:16   ` Alan Stern
2009-05-05  0:33     ` David VomLehn
2009-05-05  0:31   ` [PATCH 1/5] initdev:kernel: Asynchronously-discovered devicesynchronization, v5 David VomLehn
2009-05-02 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] initdev:kernel: Asynchronously-discovered device synchronization, v5 James Bottomley
2009-05-02 17:55   ` Alan Stern
2009-05-03 23:21     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-05-04 14:30       ` Alan Stern
2009-05-04 14:45         ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-05-04 15:07           ` Alan Stern
2009-05-05 15:47             ` Ming Lei
2009-05-05 15:53               ` Ming Lei
2009-06-05 18:00                 ` David VomLehn
2009-06-05 17:58               ` David VomLehn
2009-05-05  0:55     ` David VomLehn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090504074522.13f1ed77@infradead.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dvomlehn@cisco.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox