From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758207AbZEDPif (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 11:38:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757502AbZEDPiY (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 11:38:24 -0400 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:36892 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754367AbZEDPiX (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 11:38:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 08:38:15 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , tridge@samba.org, Al Viro , Pavel Machek , Christoph Hellwig , Steve French , Dave Kleikamp , Ogawa Hirofumi , linux-fsdevel , Michael Tokarev , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option Message-ID: <20090504153815.GB6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20090502013729.GI6996@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090503225616.GD8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20090504063431.GK7141@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504124129.GL7141@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504124433.GW8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504130638.GN7141@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504132119.GX8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504143919.GA6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504150834.GZ8822@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090504150834.GZ8822@parisc-linux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:08:34AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 07:39:19AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 07:21:19AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > Bringing the patch to a public mailing list is a waste of time until > > > there's a reliable description of the problem you're trying to solve. > > > > Please see the original patch. It does describes what it is doing. > > "What", but not "Why". Which is only acceptable in GNU changelogs ;-) ;-) > Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre Given your affiliation, you should have access to people with whom you can have a meaningful conversation on the non-technical issues, but without putting the Linux community at risk. Thanx, Paul