From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758275AbZEDQLi (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 12:11:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758007AbZEDQLV (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 12:11:21 -0400 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:51798 "EHLO e7.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758037AbZEDQLU (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 12:11:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 09:11:15 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Matthew Wilcox , "Eric W. Biederman" , tridge@samba.org, Al Viro , Pavel Machek , Steve French , Dave Kleikamp , Ogawa Hirofumi , linux-fsdevel , Michael Tokarev , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option Message-ID: <20090504161115.GD6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20090504063431.GK7141@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504124129.GL7141@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504124433.GW8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504130638.GN7141@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504132119.GX8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504143919.GA6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504150834.GZ8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504153815.GB6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504155541.GA3391@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090504155541.GA3391@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 11:55:41AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:38:15AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Given your affiliation, you should have access to people with whom > > you can have a meaningful conversation on the non-technical issues, > > but without putting the Linux community at risk. > > You could please stop that elitest crap? Either you guys come up > with a good explanation for that patch or you go away, thanks. Where you would be the sole arbiter of "good", I take it? You had best get trained up on non-technical topics, then. ;-) Thanx, Paul