From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756235AbZEEDe4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 23:34:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753012AbZEEDep (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 23:34:45 -0400 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:55968 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751807AbZEEDep (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 23:34:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 20:34:42 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Greg KH , "Eric W. Biederman" , tridge@samba.org, Al Viro , Pavel Machek , Christoph Hellwig , Steve French , Dave Kleikamp , Ogawa Hirofumi , linux-fsdevel , Michael Tokarev , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option Message-ID: <20090505033442.GB6982@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20090504143919.GA6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504150834.GZ8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504153815.GB6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504155505.GA8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504161024.GC6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504162252.GB8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504221208.GB29402@kroah.com> <20090505020149.GE8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090505021121.GA6982@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090505021853.GF8822@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20090505021853.GF8822@parisc-linux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:18:53PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 07:11:21PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:01:49PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 03:12:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > But what was wrong with what they told us to do with regards to how to > > > > specify the copyright on a file? I don't recall seeing anything that > > > > contridicted what I was told, but that was many many years ago, so I > > > > probably am forgetting... > > > > > > I don't remember exactly, and can't be bothered to look it up. It was > > > something along the lines of you saying an IBM lawyer had told you > > > that in: > > > > > > Copyright (c) 2009 > > > > > > the (c) was a non-optional part. I found something that said the (c) > > > had no legal meaning. > > > > http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.pdf > > > > Page 4, bottom of first column through second column. > > That notices actually aren't needed any more? Yes. The bit I was > referring to was this: > > 1 The symbol © (the letter C in a circle), or the word > "Copyright," or the abbreviation "Copr."; and > > In particular, I've seen elsewhere that (c) is not a valid representation > of 'the letter C in a circle'. I am more than happy to let you search the case law on this one. Thanx, Paul