From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757125AbZEEUdR (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 16:33:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754128AbZEEUc7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 16:32:59 -0400 Received: from outbound-mail-116.bluehost.com ([69.89.22.16]:52758 "HELO outbound-mail-116.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753694AbZEEUc6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 16:32:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=lmZr3E/Ybpq2LzT3TEFn+hp3ghKt1BC2Y6sEalhE9TxBGpnUPRXqXKTmcpASHgbP0Tkqo0WHgEnl1SDlDoJVpdjdegQ2wiOypKWgg8BvYTtxmm7C8Xpxs23MIcdY33El; Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 13:32:54 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes To: Ed Swierk Cc: Ingo Molnar , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] PCI mmconfig without ACPI Message-ID: <20090505133254.2dfc1937@hobbes> In-Reply-To: <9ae48b020905051309h14cf1d7au175e19c66137555@mail.gmail.com> References: <1233766786.16414.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090204181738.GA16174@elte.hu> <1234812741.28801.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090505105744.4268e341@hobbes> <9ae48b020905051309h14cf1d7au175e19c66137555@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.28.251 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 5 May 2009 13:09:30 -0700 Ed Swierk wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > I'm still a bit dubious about this; does it solve a real issue?  Or > > just remove the ACPI dependency for its own sake? > > Our products run Linux with a non-ACPI BIOS (Coreboot), so this is not > just a theoretical issue. Ah of course, Coreboot. The patch will need a lot of testing though; care to send me an updated version so we can get it into linux-next and have some people try it out? Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center