From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] perf_counter: uncouple data_head updates from wakeups
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 17:50:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090505155436.925084300@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090505155020.309162852@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: perf_counter-uncouple-data_head-from-wakeup.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3159 bytes --]
Keep data_head up-to-date irrespective of notifications, this fixes
the case where you disable a counter and don't get a notification for
the last few pending events, and also allows polling usage.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/perf_counter.h | 4 +++-
kernel/perf_counter.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_counter.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -1696,7 +1696,6 @@ struct perf_output_handle {
struct perf_mmap_data *data;
unsigned int offset;
unsigned int head;
- int wakeup;
int nmi;
int overflow;
int locked;
@@ -1752,8 +1751,7 @@ static void perf_output_unlock(struct pe
struct perf_mmap_data *data = handle->data;
int head, cpu;
- if (handle->wakeup)
- data->wakeup_head = data->head;
+ data->done_head = data->head;
if (!handle->locked)
goto out;
@@ -1764,13 +1762,11 @@ again:
* before we publish the new head, matched by a rmb() in userspace when
* reading this position.
*/
- while ((head = atomic_xchg(&data->wakeup_head, 0))) {
+ while ((head = atomic_xchg(&data->done_head, 0)))
data->user_page->data_head = head;
- handle->wakeup = 1;
- }
/*
- * NMI can happen here, which means we can miss a wakeup_head update.
+ * NMI can happen here, which means we can miss a done_head update.
*/
cpu = atomic_xchg(&data->lock, 0);
@@ -1779,7 +1775,7 @@ again:
/*
* Therefore we have to validate we did not indeed do so.
*/
- if (unlikely(atomic_read(&data->wakeup_head))) {
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&data->done_head))) {
/*
* Since we had it locked, we can lock it again.
*/
@@ -1789,7 +1785,7 @@ again:
goto again;
}
- if (handle->wakeup)
+ if (atomic_xchg(&data->wakeup, 0))
perf_output_wakeup(handle);
out:
local_irq_restore(handle->flags);
@@ -1824,7 +1820,9 @@ static int perf_output_begin(struct perf
handle->offset = offset;
handle->head = head;
- handle->wakeup = (offset >> PAGE_SHIFT) != (head >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+ if ((offset >> PAGE_SHIFT) != (head >> PAGE_SHIFT))
+ atomic_set(&data->wakeup, 1);
return 0;
@@ -1882,7 +1880,7 @@ static void perf_output_end(struct perf_
int events = atomic_inc_return(&data->events);
if (events >= wakeup_events) {
atomic_sub(wakeup_events, &data->events);
- handle->wakeup = 1;
+ atomic_set(&data->wakeup, 1);
}
}
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_counter.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/perf_counter.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/perf_counter.h
@@ -362,9 +362,11 @@ struct perf_mmap_data {
atomic_t head; /* write position */
atomic_t events; /* event limit */
- atomic_t wakeup_head; /* completed head */
+ atomic_t done_head; /* completed head */
atomic_t lock; /* concurrent writes */
+ atomic_t wakeup; /* needs a wakeup */
+
struct perf_counter_mmap_page *user_page;
void *data_pages[0];
};
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-05 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-05 15:50 [PATCH 0/7] pending sched and perf_counter patches Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 15:50 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched: rt: document the risk of small values in the bandwidth settings Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 18:33 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 15:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-05-05 18:34 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: uncouple data_head updates from wakeups tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 15:50 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf_counter: ioctl(PERF_COUNTER_IOC_RESET) Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 18:31 ` Corey Ashford
2009-05-05 18:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 19:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-05 18:34 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: add ioctl(PERF_COUNTER_IOC_RESET) tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 15:50 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf_counter: provide an mlock threshold Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 18:34 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 15:50 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf_counter: fix the output lock Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 18:34 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 15:50 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf_counter: inheritable sample counters Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 18:34 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 15:50 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf_counter: tools: update the tools to support process and inherited counters Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-05 18:34 ` [tip:perfcounters/core] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090505155436.925084300@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox