From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752694AbZEFHDj (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 03:03:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751120AbZEFHD3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 03:03:29 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f125.google.com ([209.85.221.125]:57089 "EHLO mail-qy0-f125.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750789AbZEFHD2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 03:03:28 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1153 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 03:03:27 EDT DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=NeE0ggtSPvZn4e9XGfhtuIv66wBuxycMTR7SGUX3NCisVs7kKntoVRLsejYdQu5w4u qhuRtjcOHzLdoiG/6nLXA2APOONV6dZRuQja6kiZ2HujML6gDcnc0yePsBbcqzpG83IJ QhhDH4XsUhYouGAziYxPfJaVOQCKrKjOGKWfw= Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:03:23 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Minchan Kim Cc: Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , LMMML , LKML , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH -mmotm] mm: setup_per_zone_inactive_ratio - fix comment and make it __init Message-ID: <20090506070323.GC4865@lenovo> References: <20090506061923.GA4865@lenovo> <20090506155145.e657b271.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090506155145.e657b271.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Minchan Kim - Wed, May 06, 2009 at 03:51:45PM +0900] | On Wed, 6 May 2009 10:19:23 +0400 | Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | | > The caller of setup_per_zone_inactive_ratio is module_init function. | | __init :) | | > No need to keep the callee after is completed as well. | > Also fix a comment. | > | > CC: David Rientjes | > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov | | Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim | I guess the comment was a typo. Thanks Minchan. Actually it's not a typo :) module_init function is supposed to be __initcall function anyway. But it's confusing I could fix changelog. -- Cyrill