linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
	mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it,
	jens.axboe@oracle.com, ryov@valinux.co.jp,
	fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, righi.andrea@gmail.com,
	agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com,
	m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: IO scheduler based IO Controller V2
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:10:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090506161012.GC8180@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A014619.1040000@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 04:11:05PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > Here is the V2 of the IO controller patches generated on top of 2.6.30-rc4.
> > First version of the patches was posted here.
> 
> Hi Vivek,
> 
> I did some simple test for V2, and triggered an kernel panic.
> The following script can reproduce this bug. It seems that the cgroup
> is already removed, but IO Controller still try to access into it.
> 

Hi Gui,

Thanks for the report. I use cgroup_path() for debugging. I guess that
cgroup_path() was passed null cgrp pointer that's why it crashed.

If yes, then it is strange though. I call cgroup_path() only after
grabbing a refenrece to css object. (I am assuming that if I have a valid
reference to css object then css->cgrp can't be null).

Anyway, can you please try out following patch and see if it fixes your
crash.

---
 block/elevator-fq.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux11/block/elevator-fq.c
===================================================================
--- linux11.orig/block/elevator-fq.c	2009-05-05 15:38:06.000000000 -0400
+++ linux11/block/elevator-fq.c	2009-05-06 11:55:47.000000000 -0400
@@ -125,6 +125,9 @@ static void io_group_path(struct io_grou
 	unsigned short id = iog->iocg_id;
 	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
 
+	/* For error case */
+	buf[0] = '\0';
+
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	if (!id)
@@ -137,15 +140,12 @@ static void io_group_path(struct io_grou
 	if (!css_tryget(css))
 		goto out;
 
-	cgroup_path(css->cgroup, buf, buflen);
+	if (css->cgroup)
+		cgroup_path(css->cgroup, buf, buflen);
 
 	css_put(css);
-
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	return;
 out:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	buf[0] = '\0';
 	return;
 }
 #endif

BTW, I tried following equivalent script and I can't see the crash on 
my system. Are you able to hit it regularly?

Instead of killing the tasks I also tried moving the tasks into root cgroup
and then deleting test1 and test2 groups, that also did not produce any crash.
(Hit a different bug though after 5-6 attempts :-)

As I mentioned in the patchset, currently we do have issues with group
refcounting and cgroup/group going away. Hopefully in next version they
all should be fixed up. But still, it is nice to hear back...


#!/bin/sh

../mount-cgroups.sh

# Mount disk
mount /dev/sdd1 /mnt/sdd1
mount /dev/sdd2 /mnt/sdd2

echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches

dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/sdd1/testzerofile1 bs=4K count=524288 &
pid1=$!
echo $pid1 > /cgroup/bfqio/test1/tasks
echo "Launched $pid1"

dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/sdd2/testzerofile1 bs=4K count=524288 &
pid2=$!
echo $pid2 > /cgroup/bfqio/test2/tasks
echo "Launched $pid2"

#echo "sleeping for 10 seconds"
#sleep 10
#echo "Killing pid $pid1"
#kill -9 $pid1
#echo "Killing pid $pid2"
#kill -9 $pid2
#sleep 5

echo "sleeping for 10 seconds"
sleep 10

echo "moving pid $pid1 to root"
echo $pid1 > /cgroup/bfqio/tasks
echo "moving pid $pid2 to root"
echo $pid2 > /cgroup/bfqio/tasks

echo ======
cat /cgroup/bfqio/test1/io.disk_time
cat /cgroup/bfqio/test2/io.disk_time

echo ======
cat /cgroup/bfqio/test1/io.disk_sectors
cat /cgroup/bfqio/test2/io.disk_sectors

echo "Removing test1"
rmdir /cgroup/bfqio/test1
echo "Removing test2"
rmdir /cgroup/bfqio/test2

echo "Unmounting /cgroup"
umount /cgroup/bfqio
echo "Done"
#rmdir /cgroup



> #!/bin/sh
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> mkdir /cgroup 2> /dev/null
> mount -t cgroup -o io,blkio io /cgroup
> mkdir /cgroup/test1
> mkdir /cgroup/test2
> echo 100 > /cgroup/test1/io.weight
> echo 500 > /cgroup/test2/io.weight
> 
> ./rwio -w -f 2000M.1 &  //do async write
> pid1=$!
> echo $pid1 > /cgroup/test1/tasks
> 
> ./rwio -w -f 2000M.2 &
> pid2=$!
> echo $pid2 > /cgroup/test2/tasks
> 
> sleep 10
> kill -9 $pid1
> kill -9 $pid2
> sleep 1
> 
> echo ======
> cat /cgroup/test1/io.disk_time
> cat /cgroup/test2/io.disk_time
> 
> echo ======
> cat /cgroup/test1/io.disk_sectors
> cat /cgroup/test2/io.disk_sectors
> 
> rmdir /cgroup/test1
> rmdir /cgroup/test2
> umount /cgroup
> rmdir /cgroup
> 
> 
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereferec
> IP: [<c0448c24>] cgroup_path+0xc/0x97
> *pde = 64d2d067
> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> last sysfs file: /sys/block/md0/range
> Modules linked in: ipv6 cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq dm_mirror dm_multipath sbd
> Pid: 132, comm: kblockd/0 Not tainted (2.6.30-rc4-Vivek-V2 #1) Veriton M460
> EIP: 0060:[<c0448c24>] EFLAGS: 00010086 CPU: 0
> EIP is at cgroup_path+0xc/0x97
> EAX: 00000100 EBX: f60adca0 ECX: 00000080 EDX: f709fe28
> ESI: f60adca8 EDI: f709fe28 EBP: 00000100 ESP: f709fdf0
>  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
> Process kblockd/0 (pid: 132, ti=f709f000 task=f70a8f60 task.ti=f709f000)
> Stack:
>  f709fe28 f68c5698 f60adca0 f60adca8 f709fe28 f68de801 c04f5389 00000080
>  f68de800 f7094d0c f6a29118 f68bde00 00000016 c04f5e8d c04f5340 00000080
>  c0579fec f68c5e94 00000082 c042edb4 f68c5fd4 f68c5fd4 c080b520 00000082
> Call Trace:
>  [<c04f5389>] ? io_group_path+0x6d/0x89
>  [<c04f5e8d>] ? elv_ioq_served+0x2a/0x7a
>  [<c04f5340>] ? io_group_path+0x24/0x89
>  [<c0579fec>] ? ide_build_dmatable+0xda/0x130
>  [<c042edb4>] ? lock_timer_base+0x19/0x35
>  [<c042ef0c>] ? mod_timer+0x9f/0xa8
>  [<c04fdee6>] ? __delay+0x6/0x7
>  [<c057364f>] ? ide_execute_command+0x5d/0x71
>  [<c0579d4f>] ? ide_dma_intr+0x0/0x99
>  [<c0576496>] ? do_rw_taskfile+0x201/0x213
>  [<c04f6daa>] ? __elv_ioq_slice_expired+0x212/0x25e
>  [<c04f7e15>] ? elv_fq_select_ioq+0x121/0x184
>  [<c04e8a2f>] ? elv_select_sched_queue+0x1e/0x2e
>  [<c04f439c>] ? cfq_dispatch_requests+0xaa/0x238
>  [<c04e7e67>] ? elv_next_request+0x152/0x15f
>  [<c04240c2>] ? dequeue_task_fair+0x16/0x2d
>  [<c0572f49>] ? do_ide_request+0x10f/0x4c8
>  [<c0642d44>] ? __schedule+0x845/0x893
>  [<c042edb4>] ? lock_timer_base+0x19/0x35
>  [<c042f1be>] ? del_timer+0x41/0x47
>  [<c04ea5c6>] ? __generic_unplug_device+0x23/0x25
>  [<c04f530d>] ? elv_kick_queue+0x19/0x28
>  [<c0434b77>] ? worker_thread+0x11f/0x19e
>  [<c04f52f4>] ? elv_kick_queue+0x0/0x28
>  [<c0436ffc>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d
>  [<c0434a58>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x19e
>  [<c0436f3b>] ? kthread+0x42/0x67
>  [<c0436ef9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x67
>  [<c040326f>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> Code: c0 84 c0 74 0e 89 d8 e8 7c e9 fd ff eb 05 bf fd ff ff ff e8 c0 ea ff ff 8
> EIP: [<c0448c24>] cgroup_path+0xc/0x97 SS:ESP 0068:f709fdf0
> CR2: 000000000000011c
> ---[ end trace 2d4bc25a2c33e394 ]---
> 
> -- 
> Regards
> Gui Jianfeng
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-06 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 133+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-05 19:58 IO scheduler based IO Controller V2 Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 01/18] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06  3:16   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-06 13:31     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 02/18] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-05-22  6:43   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-22 12:32     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-23 20:04       ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 03/18] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 04/18] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-05-22  8:54   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-22 12:33     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 05/18] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-05-07  7:42   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-07  8:05     ` Li Zefan
2009-05-08 12:45     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08 21:09   ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-08 21:17     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 06/18] io-controller: cfq changes to use " Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 07/18] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-05-13  2:39   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 14:51     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  7:53       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 08/18] io-controller: idle for sometime on sync queue before expiring it Vivek Goyal
2009-05-13 15:00   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09  7:56   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-09 17:51     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-10  1:30       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-10 13:26         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-11  1:22           ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 09/18] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 10/18] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 11/18] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 12/18] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 13/18] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 14/18] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 15/18] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 16/18] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 17/18] io-controller: IO group refcounting support Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08  2:59   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-08 12:44     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 18/18] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 21:40   ` IKEDA, Munehiro
2009-05-06 21:58     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 22:19       ` IKEDA, Munehiro
2009-05-06 22:24         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 23:01           ` IKEDA, Munehiro
2009-05-05 20:24 ` IO scheduler based IO Controller V2 Andrew Morton
2009-05-05 22:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-06  3:42     ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-06 10:20       ` Fabio Checconi
2009-05-06 17:10         ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-06 18:47       ` Divyesh Shah
2009-05-06 20:42       ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-06  2:33   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 17:59     ` Nauman Rafique
2009-05-06 20:07     ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-06 21:21       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 22:02         ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-06 22:17           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 20:32     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 21:34       ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-06 21:52         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 22:35           ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-07  1:48             ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-07  9:04           ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-07 12:22             ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-07 14:11             ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-07 14:45               ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-07 15:36                 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-07 15:42                   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-07 22:19                   ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-08 18:09                     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08 20:05                       ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-08 21:56                         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-09  9:22                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-14 10:31                           ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-14 16:43                           ` Dhaval Giani
2009-05-07 22:40                 ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-07  0:18     ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-07  1:25       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-11 11:23         ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-11 12:49           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08 14:24       ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-11 10:11         ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-06  3:41   ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-06 13:28     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06  8:11 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-06 16:10   ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2009-05-07  5:36     ` Li Zefan
2009-05-08 13:37       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-11  2:59         ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-07  5:47     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-08  9:45 ` [PATCH] io-controller: Add io group reference handling for request Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-08 13:57   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08 17:41     ` Nauman Rafique
2009-05-08 18:56       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08 19:06         ` Nauman Rafique
2009-05-11  1:33       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-11 15:41         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-15  5:15           ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-15  7:48             ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-15  8:16               ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-15 14:09                 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-15 14:06               ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-17 10:26                 ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-18 14:01                   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-18 14:39                     ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-26 11:34                       ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-27  6:56                         ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-27  8:17                           ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-27 11:53                             ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-27 17:32                           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-19 12:18                     ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-15  7:40           ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-15 14:01             ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-13  2:00 ` [PATCH] IO Controller: Add per-device weight and ioprio_class handling Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 14:44   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  0:59     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 15:29   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  1:02     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 15:59   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  1:51     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-14  2:25     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 17:17   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  1:24     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 19:09   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  1:35     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-14  7:26     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-14 15:15       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-18 22:33       ` IKEDA, Munehiro
2009-05-20  1:44         ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-20 15:41           ` IKEDA, Munehiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090506161012.GC8180@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpshah@google.com \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=nauman@google.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).