From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1759413AbZEFRC1@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1759413AbZEFRC1 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 6 May 2009 13:02:27 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754159AbZEFRCN
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 6 May 2009 13:02:13 -0400
Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:40536 "EHLO coco.kroah.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753112AbZEFRCN (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 6 May 2009 13:02:13 -0400
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:37:31 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>, cl@linux-foundation.org,
       mel@csn.ul.ie, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.L-H@gmx.de>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
       ebmunson@us.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] patch
	mm-fix-committed_as-underflow-on-large-nr_cpus-environment.patch
	added to 2.6.29-stable tree
Message-ID: <20090506163731.GA3764@kroah.com>
References: <20090504220454.3F71148FB8@coco.kroah.org> <200905052036.24106.s.L-H@gmx.de> <20090505221403.GA4714@suse.de> <2f11576a0905051526j73dd1570nb440e4b78e3b35a9@mail.gmail.com> <20090505225932.GA4982@suse.de> <2f11576a0905051612p140e077fva214e954273a39df@mail.gmail.com> <20090506062058.GA6916@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090506062058.GA6916@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:20:58PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 08:12:21AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 07:26:51AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > >> Could you please post oops log?
> > >> current mmotm (include this patch) works fine on my x86_64 box. Then,
> > >> I have no hint now ;-)
> > >
> > > Attached is a picture of the oops.
> > >
> > > Hope this helps,
> > 
> > OK, the reason is 99% mis-applied patch. I've made rebased patch.
> > 
> > in my environment
> > 
> > 2.6.29.2 + original patch:  panic
> > 2.6.29.2 + rebased patch:  works well
> > 
> > Could you please try it?
> 
> thank you for looking into this, I'll try it out tomorrow morning and
> let you know how it goes.

Yes, this works!

Thanks so much for working so quickly to resolve this.  I've added the
updated patch to the .29-stable queue.

greg k-h