From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760113AbZEFR7U (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 13:59:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754760AbZEFR7I (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 13:59:08 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:42335 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754573AbZEFR7H (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 13:59:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:59:06 +0100 From: Al Viro To: ericvh@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: oddity in v9fs_kill_super() Message-ID: <20090506175906.GW8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Is there any reason to do v9fs_dentry_release(s->s_root) in ->kill_sb()? It is called when root dentry is freed and it will be freed just fine...