From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756793AbZEGIKA (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 04:10:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751954AbZEGIJm (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 04:09:42 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:33421 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750954AbZEGIJk (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 04:09:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:09:14 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Li Zefan Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tzanussi@gmail.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, fweisbec@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:tracing/core] tracing/events: fix concurrent access to ftrace_events list Message-ID: <20090507080914.GA12285@elte.hu> References: <4A00F709.3080800@cn.fujitsu.com> <4A028993.7020509@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A028993.7020509@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Li Zefan wrote: > tip-bot for Li Zefan wrote: > > Commit-ID: 20c8928abe70e204bd077ab6cfe23002d7788983 > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/20c8928abe70e204bd077ab6cfe23002d7788983 > > Author: Li Zefan > > AuthorDate: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:33:45 +0800 > > Committer: Ingo Molnar > > CommitDate: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:38:19 +0200 > > > > tracing/events: fix concurrent access to ftrace_events list > > > > There is a deadlock in this patch, and I sent out a v2 patch and > expected it to be applied: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/6/26 ah, i probably already had the first one applied. > Below is a fix on top of this patch. Sorry for my carelessness. thanks, applied. No need to be sorry! btw., we might want to add self-tests for filter functionality too perhaps? Ingo