From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
anton@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Reduce the default HZ value
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:51:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090507195142.GH6693@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0905071350550.22107@qirst.com>
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 01:51:58PM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2009, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 01:20:29PM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Thu, 7 May 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > > Another user is RCU, the grace period is tick driven, growing these
> > > > ticks by a factor 50 or so might require some tinkering with forced
> > > > grace periods when we notice our batch queues getting too long.
> > >
> > > One could also schedule RCU via hrtimers with a large fuzz period?
> >
> > You could, but then you would still have a periodic interrupt introducing
> > jitter into your HPC workload. The approach I suggested allows RCU to be
> > happy with no periodic interrupts on any CPU that has only one runnable
> > task that is a CPU-bound user-level task (in addition to the idle task,
> > of course).
>
> Sounds good.
>
> An HPC workload typically has minimal kernel interaction. RCU would
> only need to run once and then the system would be quiet.
Peter Z's post leads me to believe that there might be dragons in
this approach that I am blissfully unaware of. However, here is what
would have to happen from an RCU perspective, in case it helps:
o This new mode needs to imply CONFIG_NO_HZ.
o When a given CPU is transitioning into tickless mode, invoke
rcu_enter_nohz(). This already happens for dynticks-idle,
this would be a dynticks-CPU-bound-usermode-task.
Note that CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels already invokes rcu_enter_nohz()
from tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(), and many of the things in
tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() would need to be done in this case
as well.
o When a given CPU is transitioning out of tickless mode, invoke
rcu_exit_nohz(). Again, this already happens for dynticks-idle.
Note that CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels already invoke rcu_exit_nohz()
from tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(), which does other stuff that
would be required in your case as well.
o When a given CPU in tickless mode transitions into the kernel
via a system call or trap, invoke rcu_irq_enter(). Note that
rcu_irq_enter() is already invoked on irq entry if CONFIG_NO_HZ.
NMIs are also already handled via rcu_nmi_enter().
o When a given CPU in tickless mode transitions out of the kernel
from a system call or trap, invoke rcu_irq_exit(). Note that
rcu_irq_exit() is already invoked on irq exit if CONFIG_NO_HZ.
NMIs are also already handled via rcu_nmi_exit().
Then RCU would know that any CPU running a CPU-bound user-mode task
need not be consulted when working out when a grace period ends, since
user-mode code cannot contain kernel-mode RCU read-side critical sections.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-07 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-04 18:44 [PATCH] x86: Reduce the default HZ value Alok Kataria
2009-05-05 21:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-05 21:44 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-05 22:09 ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-05 22:33 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-05 23:37 ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-07 14:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 15:12 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-05 21:57 ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-07 14:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 15:14 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 15:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 15:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-07 15:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 16:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-07 17:09 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 17:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-07 19:51 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 20:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-05-07 20:30 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 16:37 ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-07 17:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-07 17:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 19:51 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2009-05-07 17:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-07 17:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 18:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-07 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 19:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-07 19:53 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 19:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 20:24 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 20:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-08 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-08 12:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-08 14:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-08 15:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-07 17:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 17:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 17:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-07 19:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-05-07 21:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-07 16:35 ` Chris Snook
2009-05-07 16:56 ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-07 20:29 ` Chris Snook
2009-05-07 20:34 ` Alan Cox
2009-05-07 22:16 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-05-07 22:19 ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-08 9:31 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-12 19:45 devzero
2009-05-13 23:30 ` Alok Kataria
2009-05-14 20:25 devzero
2009-05-14 20:29 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090507195142.GH6693@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox