From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756616AbZEHFTG (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 01:19:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752283AbZEHFSz (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 01:18:55 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:51323 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751487AbZEHFSy (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2009 01:18:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 22:13:42 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Suresh Jayaraman Cc: Chris Frey , chrisw@sous-sol.org, smfrench@gmail.com, jlayton@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , Chuck Ebbert , Domenico Andreoli , Willy Tarreau , Rodrigo Rubira Branco , Jake Edge , Eugene Teo , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [patch 00/58] 2.6.29.3-stable review Message-ID: <20090508051342.GA11425@suse.de> References: <20090506215017.GA21981@kroah.com> <20090507172301.GA28595@foursquare.net> <20090507221313.GA7126@suse.de> <4A03B5FD.4020907@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A03B5FD.4020907@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:03:01AM +0530, Suresh Jayaraman wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 01:23:04PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > >> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 02:50:17PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.29.3 release. > >>> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to > >>> this one. > >> Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see any of > >> the fs/cifs/connect.c security fixes from commits such as > >> f083def68f84b04fe3f97312498911afce79609e. I was hoping this would make > >> it into 2.6.29.3. > > > > No one sent them to stable@kernel.org for inclusion :( > > Sorry, the patches were sent to cifs mailing list for > consensus/discussion and -stable inclusion request has not happened > (though Steve Cced stable the summary email with his ACK). I'm sending > the patches right away.. and hope it's not too late for 29.3 Yes, it's too late for .3, that review cycle started yesterday and will be released tomorrow. > I have based the patches on top of 2.6.29.2. Thanks, we can always start a new review cycle on Friday with these if needed. thanks, greg k-h